From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
aquini@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Move waiting on contended ticket lock out of line
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:46:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxx7QDF0y=Rk0bSoDNKn-+=b96hYMYUJ0s31disRob0Wg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFws80EEJQskqiP+a5J-HOGu=M1Fe=uCs50ifedVxPxT1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Now, on other machines you get the call chain even with pebs because
> you can get the whole
Oops, that got cut short early, because I started looking up when PEBS
and the last-branch-buffer work together, and couldn't find it, and
then came back to the email and forgot to finish the sentence.
Anyway: sometimes you get call chains with precise events, sometimes
you don't. And it turns out that I can't find out which cores do both,
and which ones don't.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-06 20:03 [PATCH -v5 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning Rik van Riel
2013-02-06 20:04 ` [PATCH -v5 1/5] x86,smp: move waiting on contended ticket lock out of line Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 12:06 ` [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Move " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-14 0:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-14 1:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-15 15:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-15 6:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-02-13 19:08 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 22:21 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 23:41 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-14 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-14 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2013-02-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-27 16:42 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-27 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-27 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-27 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-27 21:55 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwa0EjGG2NUDYVLVBmXJa2k81YiuNO2yggk=GLRQxhhUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-02-28 2:58 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-28 3:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-28 4:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-02-28 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-28 15:13 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-28 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-28 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-28 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-28 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-28 22:38 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-28 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 6:42 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-01 18:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-03-01 18:50 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-01 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-06 20:04 ` [PATCH -v5 2/5] x86,smp: proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 12:07 ` [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Implement " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2013-02-06 20:05 ` [PATCH -v5 3/5] x86,smp: auto tune spinlock backoff delay factor Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 12:08 ` [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Auto " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2013-02-06 20:06 ` [PATCH -v5 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 12:09 ` [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Keep " tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2013-02-06 20:07 ` [PATCH -v5 5/5] x86,smp: limit spinlock delay on virtual machines Rik van Riel
2013-02-07 11:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-07 21:24 ` [PATCH fix " Rik van Riel
2013-02-13 12:10 ` [tip:core/locking] x86/smp: Limit " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2013-02-07 11:25 ` [PATCH -v5 5/5] x86,smp: limit " Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-07 11:59 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-02-07 13:28 ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-06 20:08 ` [PATCH -v5 6/5] x86,smp: add debugging code to track spinlock delay value Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFxx7QDF0y=Rk0bSoDNKn-+=b96hYMYUJ0s31disRob0Wg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.