From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752118Ab1GTOks (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:40:48 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35553 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969Ab1GTOkr (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:40:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110720221420.153b0830@kryten> References: <20110707102107.GA16666@in.ibm.com> <1310036375.3282.509.camel@twins> <20110714103418.7ef25b68@kryten> <20110714143521.5fe4fab6@kryten> <1310649379.2586.273.camel@twins> <20110715104547.29c3c509@kryten> <1311024956.2309.22.camel@laptop> <20110719144451.79bc69ab@kryten> <1311070894.13765.180.camel@twins> <20110720201436.19e9689a@kryten> <1311158708.5345.12.camel@twins> <20110720221420.153b0830@kryten> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:40:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982 To: Anton Blanchard Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@elte.hu, benh@kernel.crashing.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote: > >> So with that fix the patch makes the machine happy again? > > Yes, the machine looks fine with the patches applied. Thanks! Ok, so what's the situation for 3.0 (I'm waiting for some RCU resolution now)? Anton's patch may be small, but that's just the tiny fixup patch to Peter's much scarier one ;) Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DF1B6F77 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:40:49 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id p6KEei0O013139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:40:46 -0700 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so4603635wwi.2 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:40:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110720221420.153b0830@kryten> References: <20110707102107.GA16666@in.ibm.com> <1310036375.3282.509.camel@twins> <20110714103418.7ef25b68@kryten> <20110714143521.5fe4fab6@kryten> <1310649379.2586.273.camel@twins> <20110715104547.29c3c509@kryten> <1311024956.2309.22.camel@laptop> <20110719144451.79bc69ab@kryten> <1311070894.13765.180.camel@twins> <20110720201436.19e9689a@kryten> <1311158708.5345.12.camel@twins> <20110720221420.153b0830@kryten> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:40:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982 To: Anton Blanchard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote: > >> So with that fix the patch makes the machine happy again? > > Yes, the machine looks fine with the patches applied. Thanks! Ok, so what's the situation for 3.0 (I'm waiting for some RCU resolution now)? Anton's patch may be small, but that's just the tiny fixup patch to Peter's much scarier one ;) Linus