From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753103AbcHPAu2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:50:28 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:35768 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752475AbcHPAu1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:50:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160816003826.GG16044@dastard> References: <20160815022808.GX19025@dastard> <20160815050016.GY19025@dastard> <20160815222211.GA19025@dastard> <20160815224259.GB19025@dastard> <20160816003826.GG16044@dastard> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:50:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9vBJe8nydfCrErVuE4unXDLhbhA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression To: Dave Chinner Cc: Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Vlastimil Babka , Bob Peterson , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Huang, Ying" , Christoph Hellwig , Wu Fengguang , LKP , Tejun Heo , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Same in 4.7 (flat profile numbers climbed higher after this > snapshot was taken, as can be seen by the callgraph numbers): Ok, so it's not the zone-vs-node thing. It's just that nobody has looked at that load in recent times. Where "recent" may be years, of course. Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6795477736852522527==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Linus Torvalds To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160816003826.GG16044@dastard> List-Id: --===============6795477736852522527== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Same in 4.7 (flat profile numbers climbed higher after this > snapshot was taken, as can be seen by the callgraph numbers): Ok, so it's not the zone-vs-node thing. It's just that nobody has looked at that load in recent times. Where "recent" may be years, of course. Linus --===============6795477736852522527==--