From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3307C433EF for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842262089C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="JoD+em0y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 842262089C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934902AbeFLBEr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:04:47 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:33903 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934315AbeFLBEq (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:04:46 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e15-v6so26148018iog.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=s9CtnB5PTakKhR2oybOA6CcNCYSheVb5PT1xfdRRG0Y=; b=JoD+em0yFA5RtkiXeUh9cqqL7TXtP39a9nMf3r6lhAzn7754XQWs8MTZ8rSOr2oYhM yRn1VH8ARUOfzsGWYBMpxAS0dB+i2kUaAjaAbrE0i8NYE7sQ0u5MqepnjTL50g/M6wGF DDyW33fuEKAvJEgryNDtojaPHQU9fbHkWvA3g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s9CtnB5PTakKhR2oybOA6CcNCYSheVb5PT1xfdRRG0Y=; b=DG6X2k0dzVZNqL3APIvbeIHCNKnXDnPlDO63hlakvlp3530ZG/Gtdr0n4Ld8C92xP/ VVV2pvAWJAw/Lx9hiV3UJ5Odq+w03CR9gKjDhpnYs5kNRJhmuHPlpCtxtHKnWPSKB8CT GH1eY8J6/gjDlqsYOJsXGJveX6zkjt210G03bW9M6yCQJE68w4XIvolrrXx0PHG+SF12 UgeCZvuxfy+zcYIp+l/JcLdf0oYuc7YRUYWdaru1kyiQ9nyWuuHFgzs9FmappaoCXYi0 dKsFSZ9SjbjkOVD9IKtWubHwGAaHdB7DgpvcTrSOkYZESNAlSB62JoIcFBtY3L4Td5J6 Xeiw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E03ycJe1MK9OcMRlRmnWhBoGFwUMrhppuhZdu4XtzcdE1EUIfSH L8A3xF9YTwAsTj5108XS4oq3R0QNXb/58RlGoC8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJQsHsIMD8rV8yJB2l5Srqe5eZ5jV/hFa7NsRSxgysNGaNvt+lH3prz12gF+NfN/ITJgsxkvxZR9KY1G2d7wq4= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1502:: with SMTP id 2-v6mr1435294iov.203.1528765485738; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180612000142.28883-1-olof@lixom.net> <20180612000142.28883-3-olof@lixom.net> In-Reply-To: <20180612000142.28883-3-olof@lixom.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/4] ARM: Device-tree updates To: Olof Johansson Cc: ARM SoC , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > > - Qualcomm: > + SDM845, a.k.a Snapdragon 845, an 4+4-core Kryo 385/845 > (Cortex-A75/A55 derivative) SoC that's one of the current high-end > mobile SoCs. > > It's great to see mainline support for it. So far, you > can't do much with it, since a lot of peripherals are not yet in the > DTs but driver support for USB, GPU and other pieces are starting to > trickle in. This might end up being a well-supported SoC upstream if > the momentum keeps up. Isn't the Qualcomm 845 also the SoC in some of the new WARM laptops? I asked one person that had an older one (ASUS NovaGo - Qualcomm 835), and apparently you can actually disable secure boot on that thing and boot from USB. In other words, it might _actually_ act like a normal laptop. I'd love to have something that is actually a real honest-to-goodness ARM laptop finally. Are we getting at all close to that? Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: torvalds@linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:34 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/4] ARM: Device-tree updates In-Reply-To: <20180612000142.28883-3-olof@lixom.net> References: <20180612000142.28883-1-olof@lixom.net> <20180612000142.28883-3-olof@lixom.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > > - Qualcomm: > + SDM845, a.k.a Snapdragon 845, an 4+4-core Kryo 385/845 > (Cortex-A75/A55 derivative) SoC that's one of the current high-end > mobile SoCs. > > It's great to see mainline support for it. So far, you > can't do much with it, since a lot of peripherals are not yet in the > DTs but driver support for USB, GPU and other pieces are starting to > trickle in. This might end up being a well-supported SoC upstream if > the momentum keeps up. Isn't the Qualcomm 845 also the SoC in some of the new WARM laptops? I asked one person that had an older one (ASUS NovaGo - Qualcomm 835), and apparently you can actually disable secure boot on that thing and boot from USB. In other words, it might _actually_ act like a normal laptop. I'd love to have something that is actually a real honest-to-goodness ARM laptop finally. Are we getting at all close to that? Linus