From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932940Ab1JDQvd (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:51:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:51035 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932824Ab1JDQvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:51:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1317744493.29415.238.camel@pasglop> References: <1317653420-21404-3-git-send-email-mason@myri.com> <1317742838.29415.217.camel@pasglop> <1317744493.29415.238.camel@pasglop> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:51:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0lBScNHyiALdEGOwsqLFyNFHGc4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pci: Clamp pcie_set_readrq() when using "performance" settings To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Jon Mason , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jesse Barnes , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin LaHaise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> >> Well, bcrl argues that patches 1-2 of 3 are actively wrong. > > This is an argument that isn't finished :-) Oh, I absolutely *hope* it isn't finished, but there's no way I'm applying a patch for -rc9 that people are still actively arguing whether it's at all valid or not. Which is why I'm planning on applying 3/3 just to make the whole issue irrelevant for 3.1, and then the people who want to test things out can apply whatever patches they want and play with the kernel command line options to actually enable whatever behavior they are testing. Linus