From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66DE2018E for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757287AbcGJVF5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:05:57 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:35307 "EHLO mail-oi0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757207AbcGJVF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:05:56 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id r2so123911966oih.2 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:05:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1m6yAs0XR19MumAZLFSYBDxGUjdPXv9Kc5VJMFuyo0k=; b=cicI6bEMOBfEfJ2R0MhkTVI+UQ689yW6PcjdqskXIFNmLu+lkNwZYbozFMwQYCnpwL +uoSMjm60e0HRrR0UVvLymAVKLU8A+vnhkmqswqJ2P7Aw+0SdWJt7sHg6lwehlWdXPEO PFQ8XL0SCY5V5Rb09DJPcU1CtQsdewffTrVAEcqMAtZg58IYORYF6E5J6pXIH3BUYp/2 8oq6rlarnmHyWRq66XyCeqVxx6BfOOmDhG1nG76dSz0KDk8sVMSx5GoOTAvoqBc1MQWJ QLqtqewDZ4Uc5G64wlK+jBS5Ac0o8BXjavj45aOTmvw7RBb6c86wCS9QEiORWUz54XRG pT1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1m6yAs0XR19MumAZLFSYBDxGUjdPXv9Kc5VJMFuyo0k=; b=P4ByLBnzIpjes+IL2qKAoMOWD7JG3QTGUFYld63zrYO/5D0wWl2HGbZ/DDevkRVJJL lQ5rc4mgJlGJKHFqjXRAVrGOEvk71Dp4zwwJgp6qzr8VSrXTG+QuQsQnvKNnehSE0LOg V/oDPlzFvBSZWQacaVLeh6CYXvTvoiMBKsYIUlxBKH0l4CGKrezVxcnV27q4U4UL9zV+ uBhcRPZr4HKEfV0wFj96P6FMr46TGS2Z8iJaixrzOsI/QLDKgJ/LrlhB9QCvy9k4BQwb GlnHe3ehHXWBEDXs9NKtShQOoqcj6raQLYJfe1obOLKaSOpdV+B069tTFY6e7Xe/pP/d nl8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLpZRvxq1FmK68MNVw5lJwsL3QLpPhs65lyMiYMJgEbT8ZtU02l9PoKiFv6mAUtRMjriPXwFxpydlQb5g== X-Received: by 10.202.73.205 with SMTP id w196mr7473239oia.121.1468184755606; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.221.68 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87eg712v5o.fsf@linux-m68k.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:05:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -GVb81-YmJvF8HFZp2niEzzahKE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Odd git overrflow bug? To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I'll try to figure out why git-2.9.0 fails. I'm getting "extra" being -1 in strbuf_grow(). Let me dog deeper. Linus