From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752705AbeCORvK (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:51:10 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:55048 "EHLO mail-it0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488AbeCORvH (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:51:07 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtFIkGFAyuhZDHgE+M9OGRJDFaT1TthTMw+IEriZrhOe9OA0UvbQUfJd13kHwy8uLBc5F2+o+/8HqbNOK/AGnk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180315154448.16222-1-bp@alien8.de> References: <20180315154448.16222-1-bp@alien8.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:51:06 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: obCg6CKmU8oBeCmWMKU8gNpWRMc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 To: Borislav Petkov Cc: X86 ML , Andy Lutomirski , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > here's v2 with the dumpstack cleanups. This one gets rid of code_bytes= > as it was discussed last time. As a result, the code got even leaner and > simpler. I like that. :) This version looks ok to me. I'm sure there's room for tweaking here, but I'm not seeing anything alarming. Linus