From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935072AbcATD7m (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:59:42 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f196.google.com ([209.85.213.196]:35604 "EHLO mail-ig0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934054AbcATD7h (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:59:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> References: <80934665e0dd2360e2583522c7c7569e5a92be0e.1452549431.git.bcrl@kvack.org> <20160112011128.GC6033@dastard> <20160112022548.GD6033@dastard> <20160112033708.GE6033@dastard> <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:35 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q9GKDOLXbMFaxfYB6n5IxvLPU_A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync From: Linus Torvalds To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , linux-mm , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >> >> I'll have to think about this some more. > > Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering? Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a couple of days I didn't get around to this. After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach. The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway. Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments.. Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> References: <80934665e0dd2360e2583522c7c7569e5a92be0e.1452549431.git.bcrl@kvack.org> <20160112011128.GC6033@dastard> <20160112022548.GD6033@dastard> <20160112033708.GE6033@dastard> <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync From: Linus Torvalds To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , linux-mm , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >> >> I'll have to think about this some more. > > Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering? Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a couple of days I didn't get around to this. After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach. The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway. Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments.. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:35 -0800 Message-ID: References: <80934665e0dd2360e2583522c7c7569e5a92be0e.1452549431.git.bcrl@kvack.org> <20160112011128.GC6033@dastard> <20160112022548.GD6033@dastard> <20160112033708.GE6033@dastard> <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , linux-mm , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >> >> I'll have to think about this some more. > > Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering? Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a couple of days I didn't get around to this. After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach. The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway. Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments.. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org