All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>,
	Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: RANDSTRUCT structs need linux/compiler_types.h (Was: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:24:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzsiVMFZVwm92N8L=E+YgOG+fpjwxt7rmz72=yMQGz8rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j+gvH+X-XyqFbY+X0xtG2mQoL5bO7T2_QaeEyr3-Z5eLw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> I'll play with Linus's suggestion and see what we get.

It may be just as well to just include <linux/compiler_types.h> from
<linux/kconfig.h> and be done with it.

If you look at that hacky script I documented in commit 23c35f48f5fb
("pinctrl: remove include file from <linux/device.h>") and run it in a
fully built kernel tree, you'll see that that header is included from
pretty much every single file anyway. At least for me, for an
allmodconfig build, the top headers are

  23322 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/types.h
  23322 include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h
  23322 include/linux/types.h
  23322 include/uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h
  23322 include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h
  23322 include/uapi/linux/types.h
  23323 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
  23323 include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
  23323 include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
  23326 include/linux/stringify.h
  23390 include/linux/compiler_types.h

and considering that I have 25949 object files in that tree, it really
means that just about every compile ended up including that
<linux/compiler_types.h> file anyway (yeah, the "orc_types.h" header
ends up being mentioned twice for most files, so it looks even more
hot, but that's not real data).

I do hate including unnecessary stuff because it makes builds slower,
but kernel header files probably don't get much more core than
<linux/compiler_types.h>.

              Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-09  0:43 [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 Patrick McLean
2017-11-09  2:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-09  3:45   ` Al Viro
2017-11-09 19:34   ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-09 19:38     ` Al Viro
2017-11-09 19:42       ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-09 19:37   ` Al Viro
2017-11-09 19:51     ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-09 20:04       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-09 21:16         ` Al Viro
2017-11-10  1:58         ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-10 13:53           ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-10 18:42           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-10 23:26             ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-11  0:27               ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-11  2:36                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11  2:36                   ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11  2:36                   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11 16:13                   ` Kees Cook
2017-11-11 16:13                     ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-11 16:13                     ` Kees Cook
2017-11-11 17:31                     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11 17:31                       ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11 17:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 22:48                       ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-13 22:48                         ` [kernel-hardening] " Patrick McLean
2017-11-13 22:48                         ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-17  0:54                         ` Kees Cook
2017-11-17  0:54                           ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-17  0:54                           ` Kees Cook
2017-11-17 19:03                           ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-17 19:03                             ` [kernel-hardening] " Patrick McLean
2017-11-17 19:03                             ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-17 21:26                             ` Kees Cook
2017-11-17 21:26                               ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-17 21:26                               ` Kees Cook
2017-11-18  0:27                               ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  0:27                                 ` [kernel-hardening] " Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  0:27                                 ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  0:55                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  0:55                                   ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  0:55                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  1:54                                   ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  1:54                                     ` [kernel-hardening] " Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  1:54                                     ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-18  5:14                                     ` Kees Cook
2017-11-18  5:14                                       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-18  5:14                                       ` Kees Cook
2017-11-18  5:29                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  5:29                                         ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  5:29                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-18  8:20                                         ` Kees Cook
2017-11-18  8:20                                           ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-18  8:20                                           ` Kees Cook
2018-02-21 22:19                                       ` RANDSTRUCT structs need linux/compiler_types.h (Was: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11) Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-02-21 22:47                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 22:47                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 23:34                                           ` Kees Cook
2018-02-21 23:34                                             ` Kees Cook
2018-03-05  9:27                                           ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-05  9:27                                             ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-05 19:15                                             ` Kees Cook
2018-03-05 19:18                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 22:52                                         ` Kees Cook
2018-02-21 23:24                                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2018-02-22  0:12                                             ` Kees Cook
2018-02-22  0:22                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-22  0:23                                                 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-22  0:27                                                   ` Kees Cook
2017-11-11  1:13               ` [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-11  2:32                 ` Al Viro
2017-11-10  1:47       ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-09 20:47   ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-09 23:07     ` Patrick McLean
2017-11-13 22:59   ` bit tweaks [was: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11] Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-13 23:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-13 23:54       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-14 22:24         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-14 22:43           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-14 23:53             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-15  0:02               ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-11  2:47 ` [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFzsiVMFZVwm92N8L=E+YgOG+fpjwxt7rmz72=yMQGz8rg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=chutzpah@gentoo.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.