From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755475AbcGERcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:32:15 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:33388 "EHLO mail-oi0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752524AbcGERcO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:32:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <7cc588b7-f1cf-62a8-e45b-ec7d863ba51e@leemhuis.info> <20160622115131.4bh7sh6uhmmhw44v@c203.arch.suse.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:32:12 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wR_VxSiFHzSBma6-TTWqqXSNqQo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19 To: Josh Boyer Cc: Quinn Tran , Johannes Thumshirn , "Martin K. Petersen" , Thorsten Leemhuis , linux-kernel , Linux SCSI List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >> >> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) { >> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) { > > Did this wind up going into an official commit somewhere? It's not in my tree, at least. And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it". Although Johannes was right that in addition to that, the ordering of the irq setup should probably _also_ be fixed, but that's a separate patch. Linus