Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm fixes

[Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> >> commit f55548b5af87ebfc586ca75748947f1c1b1a4a52
>> >> Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
>> >> Date:   Thu Feb 5 18:30:20 2015 +0000
>> >>
>> >>     drm/i915: Don't try to reference the fb in get_initial_plane_config()
>> >>
>> >> From linux-next?
>> >
>> > Yes, building now.  Will let you know as soon as I test it on both machines.
>>
>> OK, with that commit applied I no longer get the kref.h splat and the
>> NUC machine boots headless.  I still see the backtrace below on both
>> the NUC and the macbook.  I have a copy of it with drm.debug=0xff from
>> the NUC here:
>>
>> https://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/nuc-drm-debug-ff-with-fixes.txt
>>
>> Getting better at least :).
>
> On top of what you currently have please also cherry-pick
>
> commit fb9981aa675eb7b398849915364916fd98833cfa
> Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Feb 5 19:24:25 2015 +0000
>
>     drm/i915: Fix atomic state when reusing the firmware fb
>
> from -next. Let's hope this terminates eventually ;-)

Hm.  That one doesn't apply cleanly.  I think because it needs:

>From 2d14030b1a9d0e89cfdca6f16851e2eac8cb4de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:22:18 +0000
Subject: drm/i915: Store the initial framebuffer in initial_plane_config

first.  Do you want me to grab both, or should I try and figure out
how to backport fb9981aa67 without it?

josh