From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E28BB6 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F951C4 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcqs7 with SMTP id qs7so54904486igc.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 05:37:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jwboyer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20150707092434.GE11162@sirena.org.uk> <559BEF61.8050904@roeck-us.net> <20150708075409.GJ4341@mwanda> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: From: Josh Boyer To: Jiri Kosina Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Shuah Khan , Kevin Hilman , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Tyler Baker , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> > should be sending emails to everyone introducing new build warnings. >> > Are people ignoring them? >> >> Of course people ignore them ;-) > > I think the biggest problems with these are: > > - they are all squashed together into one report, totally unrelated things > together at one place. Noone is ever going to be actively looking into > it to see whether something he's responsible for hasn't popped up > > - they are not addressed to anybody explicitly. Sending them just to LKML > is a direct ticket to the "be ignored" land Yep. The same goes for bug reports. LKML is a great archiving tool for digging through history, but it is useless as a form of general communication. josh