From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750926AbdAaWVc (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:21:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:32851 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbdAaWVa (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:21:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Tony Luck Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions To: Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Young , kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal@redhat.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini wrote: > I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what > to make of it. zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. -Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cYgoC-0007fs-RD for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:21:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r18so1341844wmd.3 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:21:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Tony Luck Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Dave Young , "vgoyal@redhat.com" On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini wrote: > I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what > to make of it. zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. -Tony _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Luck Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:21:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions Message-Id: List-Id: References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Young , kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal@redhat.com" On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini wrote: > I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what > to make of it. zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. -Tony