From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206C2C4338F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 19:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A5160FE3 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 19:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235460AbhHITCT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:02:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51614 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235246AbhHITCT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:02:19 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B063C0613D3 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t128so25037904oig.1 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y8f3q3KSUzSCoA+ilO+x9/xXUDy5ChKZccg3SbF0FPc=; b=akAKuokMuV6Ptre8t6P5fnkXdykHsE6PdZVLYHUj+m6KulfjgNbPR+kxid2wlcSuqr +AbbhHiuHD8FkvS4iMprOGUlspFHGPFlp/GvIVzbTVLbkLaj77877rY/1RJFzfhHGA3u Bl+eZBOIpbPrgpF2mxB5XtkCtEK3HVsOobGE4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y8f3q3KSUzSCoA+ilO+x9/xXUDy5ChKZccg3SbF0FPc=; b=ovS/jY7oPGLEXqxp+Xzd3uk1YZYI45/dLkt02PDNrwkt/CFVki9fu/kW75mng+yef/ GtuIEbWItgJTl72UTwV9zktj0QSBCXqLaylSj+6aZ+73zqMWmHpCA9UFpuhfzVfozxg6 HI1ziaAHnucd5fffbcFn9952d+DiLxODQm83paPjobH1c6ap7LYMY8eBiy2OEDT8F4lR VMCHU7NhlszTxf2HKyOyDITlLbVoIdDB5ZEniZEdZxerHYmMDfTtWyoWwv4ff7sB6u7J PIW0FVNDgvh0iNr5OrDBnB5dbCQ+l87B8gE6jhhS97HoxiGU5+MW+xyzACNcX+bawBeP Hr8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XwiVIMMYgsBdj+zQJ1aAmzr0ZSBERKtInFKQueevhw/30HJ+B /5kiDmZAjt5FcPBy+IiB27REJ7pau/F1gw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxD88ZdcGrxTBIJzPO3YOJhgeCa48OZOUScHZb7a3q1xMGNwPUYUzRd+DpxkGrfJnubDy9vEw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:641:: with SMTP id z1mr519099oih.108.1628535717534; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com. [209.85.167.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s35sm3416174otv.44.2021.08.09.12.01.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id bi32so1174019oib.2 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:5344:: with SMTP id h65mr477047oib.117.1628535716232; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3PGKXQ.OUNHZGPTI7091@ixit.cz> In-Reply-To: <3PGKXQ.OUNHZGPTI7091@ixit.cz> From: Brian Norris Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:01:45 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: fix wmi mgmt tx queue full due to race condition To: David Heidelberg Cc: Miaoqing Pan , Kalle Valo , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (NB: I think your Reply-To header was wrong, so I've chosen to modify that in hopes of actually reaching you.) On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:52 AM David Heidelberg wrote: > since I noticed this issue is very common (at least for me and some > others) on 4.14 kernels [1] [2] would you think that backporting this > patch into stable would make sense? I assume that at some point it > could help some OpenWRT/LEDE and other devices (since for Turris it'll > be most likely backported anyway). > > Thank you for the working on this! > David > > [1] > https://forum.turris.cz/t/5-2-4-patch-wifi-fails-after-while-wmi-mgmt-tx-queue-is-full/15510 > [2] https://forum.turris.cz/t/unstable-wifi-on-mox-b/11065/ Seems reasonable to me. The right way to submit such a request is documented here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html Because this wasn't identified as a -stable candidate when first submitted, you'll need either Option 2 or Option 3. Regards, Brian