From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94F7C4361B for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA4722ADC for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730682AbgLOR3z (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41980 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730557AbgLOR3p (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62239C0617A7 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id q16so21874029edv.10 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=soleen.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VeOwIZnD1d1CtAtOQLOWOLhM2A2wCecJ+qK1dyLboTU=; b=I96T4pSs/iDVCNO7aKjW2AuZwWdxEU4n91uXkED0FYIBHx0CVqEOOvQXv4kyHisS+A gnUtMYosW3bZnF2XVpR+v4DZTcvdLJC3svqRUoIJYTCHB5iE37EAGzkWAWhYaQpy3/Sv m96dzGoXG6KSM79QFPjc6zvwIu6CJA7IXqKG0ZnS0D/3pUm8IbEWu46Zs+kc1ktqd4Bw gbaxJoc/+fwc7jzPPY1ZRrYpVboVgiSrJ2HG0KqeEI6jSQhXxYxow+OQSOeJVd3wBwza h1uBgBabe/R5P5ARfZ9aOAcrr7JWNJOcSYdiOSlzuB7XwH7wZjoKzJKfbwV7tYH66HKG uVcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VeOwIZnD1d1CtAtOQLOWOLhM2A2wCecJ+qK1dyLboTU=; b=BOgkRwnBnPFGLQuxt3sz2z68s4l9hoqWaQYS7fxmuhXx/YDPg1VB4jpIfIItYBa/3f EwohoVleIQvuUrH4BsiEgauZyfXgeLBpXd0XTn7fmZSAFmBYBZlWcnB18pu3OqL4Gy6K kR9UAdY0x6r+2zrUSwOL5ufLLzJWLzVoJOCZW8sqWZMNkNMeyg14Nqfzg90ACxxeSTBM XjL2FLhEHtwwHMwM50DmJDL6i0BSxdGi6u1BvC+3IJNnPlutKSxzqkwCvFK+PgLnrkqV XzpsUCXlfbwJd3mx26JWXVLOJw5t9bgeKRFtnJFrIp9Lb5913l4/Ml9xLNfCk11rN7O4 NpLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CrKbGv2STHz5kwJO21jWAT4V1GrY7YjcVesruB3Bf7kwosM9R 7RddZm13mXwO0qMyDLIYvZiwzxdQ4uDFcJjji6wfuA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwO7x4LC0rkTRzmFQ3G3z7COZCV+iAl/I4ipG0U3kkQDJA750UT3AF9UiLPI5TShsk8sR9viFmJkSFFwZNTOsM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:f404:: with SMTP id r4mr3451244edm.62.1608053343982; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201211202140.396852-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201211202140.396852-5-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201214141715.GF32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201215082748.GL32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20201215082748.GL32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Pavel Tatashin Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:28:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: honor PF_MEMALLOC_PIN for all movable pages To: Michal Hocko Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , Dan Williams , Sasha Levin , Tyler Hicks , Joonsoo Kim , mike.kravetz@oracle.com, Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Jason Gunthorpe , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Matthew Wilcox , David Rientjes , John Hubbard , Linux Doc Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Fair enough. I still dislike cma being called out explicitly because > that is slightly misleading as well. gpf_to_alloc_flags would be more > explicit I believe. But I do not want to bikeshed this to death. Sounds good, I renamed it to gpf_to_alloc_flags. Thank you, Pasha From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DF9C4361B for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F56B2222F for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4F56B2222F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=soleen.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7B2B86B0068; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 763486B006C; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 652696B006E; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0130.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.130]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3CC6B0068 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115823634 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:06 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77596202292.29.music81_070f1fc27425 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE5318086CCF for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:05 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: music81_070f1fc27425 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3753 Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id p22so21862155edu.11 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=soleen.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VeOwIZnD1d1CtAtOQLOWOLhM2A2wCecJ+qK1dyLboTU=; b=I96T4pSs/iDVCNO7aKjW2AuZwWdxEU4n91uXkED0FYIBHx0CVqEOOvQXv4kyHisS+A gnUtMYosW3bZnF2XVpR+v4DZTcvdLJC3svqRUoIJYTCHB5iE37EAGzkWAWhYaQpy3/Sv m96dzGoXG6KSM79QFPjc6zvwIu6CJA7IXqKG0ZnS0D/3pUm8IbEWu46Zs+kc1ktqd4Bw gbaxJoc/+fwc7jzPPY1ZRrYpVboVgiSrJ2HG0KqeEI6jSQhXxYxow+OQSOeJVd3wBwza h1uBgBabe/R5P5ARfZ9aOAcrr7JWNJOcSYdiOSlzuB7XwH7wZjoKzJKfbwV7tYH66HKG uVcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VeOwIZnD1d1CtAtOQLOWOLhM2A2wCecJ+qK1dyLboTU=; b=cTTppTPayuEEXL2EXtcxygfGo7QOiygivn882K/FP+X8ZAmkj8n1f4wPTf3SnBzgeq n2q8vyCmgSwEuJA82gt/fiXH1CkuStwChgMbys3bmMH5aJJarfbORqiW5HZDyrKjNdX8 klxXgI5ZI6b78AkGXQCTn4v9698TBwGsOXMMrbGECv4wceiMHnk3Tm37U3uFtn5xdbLQ 2RuXzxQVA+klUwix3dnYpOvgSQ1FjGUfkPF3jiGQQSc5BoD9x0ixutwzoHSH1OsK+T5K UKGP7SyBwYTyHuC/UpgczrH3Ta3YJZUuDuzGusE7Bw8v5Vx4p0woGNf6XIstgru0PZfI UDFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Nu+HBh5uxNJMoDX3shzrYbQISCZr9dS5x/+LzNPNl2ZN5oH3s UBezxlR3OOO+YReUzBQZwRqIIh8nzkTG27Cl/l+Ilg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwO7x4LC0rkTRzmFQ3G3z7COZCV+iAl/I4ipG0U3kkQDJA750UT3AF9UiLPI5TShsk8sR9viFmJkSFFwZNTOsM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:f404:: with SMTP id r4mr3451244edm.62.1608053343982; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201211202140.396852-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201211202140.396852-5-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201214141715.GF32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201215082748.GL32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20201215082748.GL32193@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Pavel Tatashin Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:28:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: honor PF_MEMALLOC_PIN for all movable pages To: Michal Hocko Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , Dan Williams , Sasha Levin , Tyler Hicks , Joonsoo Kim , mike.kravetz@oracle.com, Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Jason Gunthorpe , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Matthew Wilcox , David Rientjes , John Hubbard , Linux Doc Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > Fair enough. I still dislike cma being called out explicitly because > that is slightly misleading as well. gpf_to_alloc_flags would be more > explicit I believe. But I do not want to bikeshed this to death. Sounds good, I renamed it to gpf_to_alloc_flags. Thank you, Pasha