All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, qwandor@google.com, dbrazdil@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:54:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTym0agkuzuy1ZnxU7QbL4jP1xmW4sX2YixBCVo5cSKzog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQkboRdFP9oPVJgn@google.com>

Hi Quentin,

> > > +       ret = pkvm_create_mappings(__hyp_bss_end, __bss_stop, prot);
> >
> > nit: for clarity, I wonder if it might be good to create an alias of
> > __hyp_bss_end as __bss_start or something. When it's been moved here,
> > it sticks out a bit more and makes the reader wonder about the
> > significance of __hyp_bss_end.
>
> I understand what you mean, but I'm not sure this aliasing is really
> going to clarify things much. We have a comment in arm.c (see
> init_hyp_mode()) to explain exactly why we're doing this, so maybe it
> would be worth adding it here too. WDYT?

Not sure to be honest. Comments are good, until they're stale, and
replicating the comment increases the odds of that happening. No
strong opinion either way.

> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -148,6 +159,57 @@ static void hpool_put_page(void *addr)
> > >         hyp_put_page(&hpool, addr);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> > > +                                        kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> > > +                                        enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> > > +                                        void * const arg)
> > > +{
> > > +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> > > +       enum pkvm_page_state state;
> > > +       kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> > > +       phys_addr_t phys;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       if (level != (KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I know that it's not in scope here, but I'm wondering whether we
> > should be checking for KVM_PTE_TYPE_PAGE instead of the level. Maybe
>
> Well these would check different things no?
>
> > it would be good to have a helper somewhere for all these checks both
> > for clarity and to ensure that nothing has gone wrong with the pte.
>
> The reason I need this check is just to make sure the call to
> host_stage2_idmap_locked() further down is correct with a hardcoded
> PAGE_SIZE size. The alternative would be to not be lazy and actually
> compute the current granule size based on the level and use that, as
> that would make this code robust to using block mappings at EL2 stage-1
> in the future.
>
> And I'll fix this up for v4.

I get it now. Thanks!
/fuad


> Cheers,
> Quentin
>
> > > +
> > > +       phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > > +       if (!addr_is_memory(phys))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * Adjust the host stage-2 mappings to match the ownership attributes
> > > +        * configured in the hypervisor stage-1.
> > > +        */
> > > +       state = pkvm_getstate(kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(pte));
> > > +       switch (state) {
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_OWNED:
> > > +               return host_stage2_set_owner_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, pkvm_hyp_id);
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       default:
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return host_stage2_idmap_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, prot);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > > +               .cb     = finalize_host_mappings_walker,
> > > +               .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > > +       };
> > > +
> > > +       return kvm_pgtable_walk(&pkvm_pgtable, 0, BIT(pkvm_pgtable.ia_bits), &walker);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >  {
> > >         struct kvm_host_data *host_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
> > > @@ -167,6 +229,10 @@ void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >         if (ret)
> > >                 goto out;
> > >
> > > +       ret = finalize_host_mappings();
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               goto out;
> > > +
> > >         pkvm_pgtable_mm_ops = (struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops) {
> > >                 .zalloc_page = hyp_zalloc_hyp_page,
> > >                 .phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt,
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > /fuad

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, qwandor@google.com, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:54:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTym0agkuzuy1ZnxU7QbL4jP1xmW4sX2YixBCVo5cSKzog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQkboRdFP9oPVJgn@google.com>

Hi Quentin,

> > > +       ret = pkvm_create_mappings(__hyp_bss_end, __bss_stop, prot);
> >
> > nit: for clarity, I wonder if it might be good to create an alias of
> > __hyp_bss_end as __bss_start or something. When it's been moved here,
> > it sticks out a bit more and makes the reader wonder about the
> > significance of __hyp_bss_end.
>
> I understand what you mean, but I'm not sure this aliasing is really
> going to clarify things much. We have a comment in arm.c (see
> init_hyp_mode()) to explain exactly why we're doing this, so maybe it
> would be worth adding it here too. WDYT?

Not sure to be honest. Comments are good, until they're stale, and
replicating the comment increases the odds of that happening. No
strong opinion either way.

> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -148,6 +159,57 @@ static void hpool_put_page(void *addr)
> > >         hyp_put_page(&hpool, addr);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> > > +                                        kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> > > +                                        enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> > > +                                        void * const arg)
> > > +{
> > > +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> > > +       enum pkvm_page_state state;
> > > +       kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> > > +       phys_addr_t phys;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       if (level != (KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I know that it's not in scope here, but I'm wondering whether we
> > should be checking for KVM_PTE_TYPE_PAGE instead of the level. Maybe
>
> Well these would check different things no?
>
> > it would be good to have a helper somewhere for all these checks both
> > for clarity and to ensure that nothing has gone wrong with the pte.
>
> The reason I need this check is just to make sure the call to
> host_stage2_idmap_locked() further down is correct with a hardcoded
> PAGE_SIZE size. The alternative would be to not be lazy and actually
> compute the current granule size based on the level and use that, as
> that would make this code robust to using block mappings at EL2 stage-1
> in the future.
>
> And I'll fix this up for v4.

I get it now. Thanks!
/fuad


> Cheers,
> Quentin
>
> > > +
> > > +       phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > > +       if (!addr_is_memory(phys))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * Adjust the host stage-2 mappings to match the ownership attributes
> > > +        * configured in the hypervisor stage-1.
> > > +        */
> > > +       state = pkvm_getstate(kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(pte));
> > > +       switch (state) {
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_OWNED:
> > > +               return host_stage2_set_owner_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, pkvm_hyp_id);
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       default:
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return host_stage2_idmap_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, prot);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > > +               .cb     = finalize_host_mappings_walker,
> > > +               .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > > +       };
> > > +
> > > +       return kvm_pgtable_walk(&pkvm_pgtable, 0, BIT(pkvm_pgtable.ia_bits), &walker);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >  {
> > >         struct kvm_host_data *host_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
> > > @@ -167,6 +229,10 @@ void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >         if (ret)
> > >                 goto out;
> > >
> > > +       ret = finalize_host_mappings();
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               goto out;
> > > +
> > >         pkvm_pgtable_mm_ops = (struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops) {
> > >                 .zalloc_page = hyp_zalloc_hyp_page,
> > >                 .phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt,
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > /fuad
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	 suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org,  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, qwandor@google.com,  dbrazdil@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:54:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTym0agkuzuy1ZnxU7QbL4jP1xmW4sX2YixBCVo5cSKzog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQkboRdFP9oPVJgn@google.com>

Hi Quentin,

> > > +       ret = pkvm_create_mappings(__hyp_bss_end, __bss_stop, prot);
> >
> > nit: for clarity, I wonder if it might be good to create an alias of
> > __hyp_bss_end as __bss_start or something. When it's been moved here,
> > it sticks out a bit more and makes the reader wonder about the
> > significance of __hyp_bss_end.
>
> I understand what you mean, but I'm not sure this aliasing is really
> going to clarify things much. We have a comment in arm.c (see
> init_hyp_mode()) to explain exactly why we're doing this, so maybe it
> would be worth adding it here too. WDYT?

Not sure to be honest. Comments are good, until they're stale, and
replicating the comment increases the odds of that happening. No
strong opinion either way.

> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -148,6 +159,57 @@ static void hpool_put_page(void *addr)
> > >         hyp_put_page(&hpool, addr);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> > > +                                        kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> > > +                                        enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> > > +                                        void * const arg)
> > > +{
> > > +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> > > +       enum pkvm_page_state state;
> > > +       kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> > > +       phys_addr_t phys;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       if (level != (KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I know that it's not in scope here, but I'm wondering whether we
> > should be checking for KVM_PTE_TYPE_PAGE instead of the level. Maybe
>
> Well these would check different things no?
>
> > it would be good to have a helper somewhere for all these checks both
> > for clarity and to ensure that nothing has gone wrong with the pte.
>
> The reason I need this check is just to make sure the call to
> host_stage2_idmap_locked() further down is correct with a hardcoded
> PAGE_SIZE size. The alternative would be to not be lazy and actually
> compute the current granule size based on the level and use that, as
> that would make this code robust to using block mappings at EL2 stage-1
> in the future.
>
> And I'll fix this up for v4.

I get it now. Thanks!
/fuad


> Cheers,
> Quentin
>
> > > +
> > > +       phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > > +       if (!addr_is_memory(phys))
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * Adjust the host stage-2 mappings to match the ownership attributes
> > > +        * configured in the hypervisor stage-1.
> > > +        */
> > > +       state = pkvm_getstate(kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(pte));
> > > +       switch (state) {
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_OWNED:
> > > +               return host_stage2_set_owner_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, pkvm_hyp_id);
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       case PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED:
> > > +               prot = pkvm_mkstate(KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED);
> > > +               break;
> > > +       default:
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return host_stage2_idmap_locked(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE, prot);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int finalize_host_mappings(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > > +               .cb     = finalize_host_mappings_walker,
> > > +               .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > > +       };
> > > +
> > > +       return kvm_pgtable_walk(&pkvm_pgtable, 0, BIT(pkvm_pgtable.ia_bits), &walker);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >  {
> > >         struct kvm_host_data *host_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
> > > @@ -167,6 +229,10 @@ void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void)
> > >         if (ret)
> > >                 goto out;
> > >
> > > +       ret = finalize_host_mappings();
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               goto out;
> > > +
> > >         pkvm_pgtable_mm_ops = (struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops) {
> > >                 .zalloc_page = hyp_zalloc_hyp_page,
> > >                 .phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt,
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > /fuad

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 13:27 [PATCH v3 00/21] Track shared pages at EL2 in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_spin_is_locked() for basic locking assertions at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_assert_lock_held() Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:27   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] KVM: arm64: Provide the host_stage2_try() helper macro Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:36   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:36     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:36     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] KVM: arm64: Introduce helper to retrieve a PTE and its level Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] KVM: arm64: Expose page-table helpers Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] KVM: arm64: Optimize host memory aborts Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] KVM: arm64: Rename KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_S2_IGNORED Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite software bits with owner id Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:38   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:38     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:38     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] KVM: arm64: Tolerate re-creating hyp mappings to set software bits Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:50   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:50     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:50     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] KVM: arm64: Enable forcing page-level stage-2 mappings Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02  9:49   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:49     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02  9:49     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:13     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:13       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:13       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:43       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:43         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:43         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] KVM: arm64: Allow populating software bits Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to tag shared pages in SW bits Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02 10:30   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 10:30     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 10:30     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] KVM: arm64: Expose host stage-2 manipulation helpers Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02 11:13   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 11:13     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 11:13     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:20     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:20       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:20       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] KVM: arm64: Expose pkvm_hyp_id Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] KVM: arm64: Introduce addr_is_memory() Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02 14:52   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 14:52     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 14:52     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:23     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:23       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:23       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] KVM: arm64: Enable retrieving protections attributes of PTEs Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-02 14:52   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 14:52     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-02 14:52     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:24     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:24       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:24       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03  5:02   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  5:02     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  5:02     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:34     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:34       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:34       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:54       ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2021-08-03 10:54         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:54         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] KVM: arm64: Remove __pkvm_mark_hyp Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] KVM: arm64: Refactor protected nVHE stage-1 locking Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03  5:31   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  5:31     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  5:31     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:37     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:37       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:37       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:51       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:51         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:51         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] KVM: arm64: Restrict EL2 stage-1 changes in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03  8:22   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  8:22     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03  8:22     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-08-03 10:43     ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:43       ` Quentin Perret
2021-08-03 10:43       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] KVM: arm64: Make __pkvm_create_mappings static Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 13:28   ` Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+EHjTym0agkuzuy1ZnxU7QbL4jP1xmW4sX2YixBCVo5cSKzog@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.