From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59BBC4332F for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356258AbiASRBR (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:01:17 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:39020 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243637AbiASRBP (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:01:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5BD40053 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642611668; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=m6Ls6d+Y7Cjt9FjfcigDcsV0viL8Djf11XJfjHvtNa65b4Lwb/6JJJa/De7PymTjt 38fD1cg78rcfrNNUkd5/JxNGQODUB3HR/QO6cATBskpvJKoKvV3BqxArCE32PiIMar HbqC2kLPlAJmuMpjG2wC3byUNnel2atnKomdu/m5lO5GGeQ5x9Z8+5wvcObeExXKQz bhhINtDYzR/gzh2GCDyN9uC0wLRzGtSQxXQFkbSaBEnUFdWoNCMVA/h+MmlwJMWkWa +AAgTVfg1FjTUJXh21F+23TAE4iTZyGeX8M66J956adbAM8YzEYHNaEVGukydbq8ZJ FJM8a5zZRNg3g== Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id el8-20020a056402360800b00403bbdcef64so3109794edb.14 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; b=M21pc/eLjuDnbvtUTbNjGAUdm9y8TceOZxakCjxTwL4/x5Zd81nylXNFOSREXHnES5 VfKL4dsj0UTS4fJIQEK9Cp56fdPUyIPbayUqG9DEtTbtj6jZjrJ+3OJIsE+h6ircy4wa 2Uwzb+0vFNo6ZvSSALTjoqNt7mPrbJFDXiNEwswNIXN2kVTIi3qAbUIJ0MzRdHeZVHpo qMP+gJ3UHXGJFZMchLSGTY+eyPAG9OL9GSpAUld5Dm7kRUJ8kO/yvgZP8BwrfCjO5jWw fqFjmMFh0wNa4aP6+957Nkw+dDSrz0OkoC1PHDB7Q8Vz1APAKBXaQAfMZ5uMygk8eo9K OJXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+DvT76nsk34Ds0JsDocAb0/j4mH/6UDgNbm5yNMOsekiXIjjg GroZm//XwOplq67Tn2qSPZcgROdDR6Ju/G9+0PtUjVRQRdXyoSdX+cYal6K64nyCKZFhv88kX6W BPerMKR+Zy9wPPMUmNu/SEuSEHkbKloTGTnqwt8CLmqjW43vyKXqfkks9bw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087790edq.53.1642611667380; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyhnpS46ePzskaoSTeiKlHBBiCrPI1N2qHZbE92eCWdfUSfFp8D1OkXo3xWWwhcrEtVqXQLzR+2Mc1a01GT6g= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087767edq.53.1642611667167; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sam Protsenko , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > the soc tree, > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > contents (anything > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > no indication of any problems so far. > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > late branch gets merged. :) Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDFCFC433EF for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:02:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1ABiaVI/FO8V/ZJXp+DfKs3ik/Bz4PyzOOhtioAXe88=; b=pa6Nf8C+xJngva tkd7xIBLNyI8wAvbpAJJElmqj/x8IndMSS7Gv+WJN4mTrpFNv++YFEGAT/FhnJYJq5FdTcaYwqRMr ZlDWFeJOQ3vWmTBJBijgIIaeXkNVTZEDe3tx1/QQxp8WaYmjks0HYcWOli5NI2F/nxHwbgPD00Ve9 ZAQeugeItuH9URNb26vj5oVWwYV1rzjOe1px809wenLkH9kPpKbEUc5bcQ2/sOD82wqDo0NK08swl yS3uxNF7CtISOdQVEGASmfDLfIoD9weB9dTymXrF5YkWc2Q75fUIqjlYWxXZaKAsa2OKML6poZ5RV YTDWHOhHj65XHpyfpDYw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nAEKk-006ToJ-Kb; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:18 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nAEKf-006TmE-9K for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:15 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6D240037 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:01:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642611667; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=D79HvQH3xbqg7euCnQasxq2FWu7klyaEN0YBiJT5jarFP/MpShs1zsjvsYVkfr1Xm m4YZkJv9UxLqQz57ZNkcG63QBOY6gTLSOBMk1hPK8JoPh8i8yWhe2qRwCYxXrBKErs 9bu10pj2PfNA0yL2RVBexuSLEv1BjTPYiWozMbtBDuNzObYuAg3unANJKzzNLATmCw aebjSzU/v7q/rPtbVAhp0JTGICXvBg+P1/nV5lG5CSNssWopA7urImlzOcT6peGWSk AdlvaETKUST7EWP7yGjEnaBaHgSh06/+YizluEknhlLrtdraM6pNrd+jlUpDxnuua5 0PvFyoVABi0LQ== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id t11-20020aa7d70b000000b004017521782dso3083706edq.19 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DsitdWyrjwAWvscnA5nwUVt0TQXqCXM23k2Tf31EYy4=; b=hgEPZBs4MRJV2TrwRlSTLqIUTL1P2QZAh+B7Qj73aq1bJJwfrUaItPU+u0hXgphBdS dU7PzJqL9sFAxMMxuRqS7T9B0TaVJShI/t+vMAQk/P5l4r5cn8TAAiA1DGU+Hwu51xPy BgQ/xW5CaEVt0/avLlMxiuhG3uDrk+A9K9lZ+kdBepInmuv+sbZVI9OePXQBkemJ1fWe jdYfqsyJLcQqGRdDGocz18qGFZ2yAGWMoAwJjt8Y1fllcr+ynBuc4oCyBAj8dj9gofO6 8nTvdk8pnaiMpaOjjfyWmk9Hujt4oMnw0RtxBtJVowlvA1Z0O7H+IM8RhREwyMeCUs0G AGtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HP7coRi4OiaZvkkyLFQz1iQ02q2cffly2ogDaGAZDxBCXswnn 2TB6ezv77O5aWsfF2aJv4Hwj7TKXJudWD625dunaXDoyIm9Uz7+XxXdlF+hfA/SY8FT4SZ3lY06 U1iEZPaVaXxp3n0NEG8/cwegFR0FUIn6AwSzjY+/T/Z7og0044YHolgMNcTtOSWg9G2ui X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087793edq.53.1642611667381; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyhnpS46ePzskaoSTeiKlHBBiCrPI1N2qHZbE92eCWdfUSfFp8D1OkXo3xWWwhcrEtVqXQLzR+2Mc1a01GT6g= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28e:: with SMTP id w14mr32087767edq.53.1642611667167; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sam Protsenko , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220119_090113_552973_4D5B74FF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > the soc tree, > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > contents (anything > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > no indication of any problems so far. > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > late branch gets merged. :) Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel