From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DFCC433F5 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6445D60F92 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231842AbhJJLjQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 07:39:16 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]:58534 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231556AbhJJLjK (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 07:39:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E437F3F324 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1633865830; bh=3aL2g6ASYJjmJXLGE2td/GKebrEEfp5cYtOVSOPNOjE=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=NlvMVZ67a0hPzWrD3G4a8t+GYgWdmcm6d6vb/KpzA0sqzAwaueSz4aW/STTaDizsx fKDZjFCsPzI6qTpRKfC9PQsJ2OlP4DjdmZuuv5WddyT2Y65VrMcqebs+81i5QkryMe l4MEo3uk0HMvUQFxKTNxZq4nnNuQp0xhdbBqaFdheqLTQA+/cLbHj29GicDdpYowF0 vqdlivyUYR4cOB0ByUmOAVFTogPwWLjftgHIOns51MaTlF7lMSKAUp/ZkmqihFAZOB LR3MqAVZQWvuIiOGXmzkg2BG1fd5cZ93N4caVo7INPdLUPd6y4OWyZcPCeYbQfthUJ HkruYINc1vNiQ== Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 2-20020a508e02000000b003d871759f5dso13240352edw.10 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3aL2g6ASYJjmJXLGE2td/GKebrEEfp5cYtOVSOPNOjE=; b=1eFqL2KPoTJLTDod3eMxLLlcgej5ZBriKm3csSGdqMfdRW3g/SJxaS7H4e2gBVCLw3 yQYOPH8ntzSQtYLXXQ+gUgQ5nzmNjpwWilzPIcdEDzFA4QC+DJ/LZNB7fr5UnOlKWRJd oo9KtP4QYSBpF8eWWKP/D0V2cezsvdXL3By1Yqxfay6HIVuC99c9gj9+hhic5Nz9JvFp qN9Rf7QSANuEYUDN02VtOX14qGGzZkkgQaIoHwfp8R2wC1BXOO3qJHjQRTc+tZ2875q/ +M4i/g5s7QPx3QcPcQ0eSPZdVzynZ2uoT46SfO45R3DMAF/4E+XhDp6YAT667euNzpkW u76Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hYbITmlHoFPbmaWY5RGiHbM9PMu9DssPR/i1fZH8Ec7+8j4JE gsWw0Fh7jk2th1EqaiG0iDghomWGhxNhtOA3PsA71ctfP1x25dggYm3yPpczbzErELdOQM+vAx3 2jHIHpRvw/I/0zz8Its8/TZ7EuSrgPYzCjku8YU6CsNZsRZ0aQ1fgKNjNcBnx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr17554111ejd.171.1633865830570; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmGfXRax8w6ByvvioynebBatQTyi+KnMs4IdARMtMQVkKFfh4370Xu091DRaFkuwupjNT9l7lw+PWQutb8gQQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr17554102ejd.171.1633865830425; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211007133021.32704-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20211008.111646.1874039740182175606.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/7] nfc: minor printk cleanup To: David Miller Cc: k.opasiak@samsung.com, mgreer@animalcreek.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:17, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:30:14 +0200 > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a rebase and resend of v2. No other changes. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > 1. Remove unused variable in pn533 (reported by kbuild). > > > > Please CC: netdev for nfc patches otherwise they will not get tracked > > and applied. > > netdev@vger.kernel.org is here. Which address I missed? The patchset reached patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=559153&state=* although for some reason it is marked as "changes requested". Are there any other changes needed except Joe's comment for one patch? Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEB3C433EF for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518C761076 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 518C761076 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7DE100EAB4B; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=185.125.188.123; helo=smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com; envelope-from=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com; receiver= Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com [185.125.188.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFD8100EAB47 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 424103FFF0 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:37:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1633865831; bh=3aL2g6ASYJjmJXLGE2td/GKebrEEfp5cYtOVSOPNOjE=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=RatrrUBM0raRQ9o99r5tsntg+AojFT1r+xlDCozpBhnbeWwHh6dk7sgiyeQB9p+RE F59A+Xo4Ee9pOJmWnm3ldFzK4rfdF6v2caoSjSGBIiUirB7bre4wavbvdpLL2lNYLr Chh5/Rxlm69N9QlHACBT6HdzaD2mn9DIEBII/Wcg4Tuct28Wzj+iIh3kFFaM4dy1LW v+Uuuc1RrPCbNJJM5cKsH0oze/RWEq/unwQZPWYu3wHr0tbbOVqBALC/EpGVPJHxiS vqIO4SjkN5UKXgXwUofVPt584F+DJ3b/qZwkaNqGq4A6hWHucYrrTomxfXXT6o7PpD HSVtr0I3G9IhA== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id r11-20020aa7cfcb000000b003d4fbd652b9so11215416edy.14 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3aL2g6ASYJjmJXLGE2td/GKebrEEfp5cYtOVSOPNOjE=; b=G1KmAeUlMQuh1ZH6dWizunFSs7BoyWjoI56dMmL3QcC0rxp5TAqqR1tx1cWVA3bbZ5 cjRM5kyh7DYOyksiXSNYEO+rbDdpTEOed2vlt5pI6N65DioK8ZRRZnuRINMamnRvubF/ PkFRAZIdQ6h9AyIZxupHuQhmbYaRbtMGWn+VFwl/nCJRsFi8wxyyPZUtxkZH6+VN071c Z2y7k68T1AIoxXR3zgrF7hwW9VrXZ6hBa2/YUbrLQp8rVI/ZpQ2f+TJo5MnmJlvm+ydf PdvdeX31an5l6/04Coe6gkxPx3GGwT2Ka6vT0f3LPJ/cnH2sCLs1bAVx6y7mhs4b47Gn 39zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EgqVF7txP4xcE1wd45vzjF2mFNtE9O3Hl00aRwxMgvo2r+v23 SX3Jq7obLLmXqNn1y60BcNZ9xnJnbDQf0eSsVkRd7+sQbX8VuZGVXHoN2QI/trIGzVGhRvh5a1F zzC6f6g5uEWtIthOm0z2xDvTetp6qWF1TBYhts97ABneOxAJpMA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr17554110ejd.171.1633865830569; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmGfXRax8w6ByvvioynebBatQTyi+KnMs4IdARMtMQVkKFfh4370Xu091DRaFkuwupjNT9l7lw+PWQutb8gQQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr17554102ejd.171.1633865830425; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211007133021.32704-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20211008.111646.1874039740182175606.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: To: David Miller Message-ID-Hash: 3LQOMCFU422WWJWGF7DXUZIEFAKVF6YC X-Message-ID-Hash: 3LQOMCFU422WWJWGF7DXUZIEFAKVF6YC X-MailFrom: krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: kuba@kernel.org, linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list Subject: [linux-nfc] Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/7] nfc: minor printk cleanup List-Id: NFC on Linux Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:17, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:30:14 +0200 > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a rebase and resend of v2. No other changes. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > 1. Remove unused variable in pn533 (reported by kbuild). > > > > Please CC: netdev for nfc patches otherwise they will not get tracked > > and applied. > > netdev@vger.kernel.org is here. Which address I missed? The patchset reached patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=559153&state=* although for some reason it is marked as "changes requested". Are there any other changes needed except Joe's comment for one patch? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Linux-nfc mailing list -- linux-nfc@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nfc-leave@lists.01.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3185259028800758691==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: linux-nfc@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/7] nfc: minor printk cleanup Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============3185259028800758691== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 12:17, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:30:14 +0200 > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a rebase and resend of v2. No other changes. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > 1. Remove unused variable in pn533 (reported by kbuild). > > > > Please CC: netdev for nfc patches otherwise they will not get tracked > > and applied. > > netdev(a)vger.kernel.org is here. Which address I missed? The patchset reached patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=3D559153&state= =3D* although for some reason it is marked as "changes requested". Are there any other changes needed except Joe's comment for one patch? Best regards, Krzysztof --===============3185259028800758691==--