From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B87C47404 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268A82190F for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KFmh28fL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731596AbfJIPWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:22:22 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f196.google.com ([209.85.219.196]:39616 "EHLO mail-yb1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728019AbfJIPWV (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:22:21 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f196.google.com with SMTP id v37so857412ybi.6 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CWOz1QdEXP+wpK9Ockn2qmCFEU7lhRlGRIngMhuNF5I=; b=KFmh28fL6uaxo5c3BTfc9tBAQTg7OlbZxBSJ5yXZtFdKk25fAhY0tUw7/49ajAUiTz Xk8ZtarH0fWKVXJuL6wuLK7ukwovsJzXmvocqjrs7Eg7Yrae2TFxOB+/EBmvjXxWSPRe zdcyxP1VomE6zRjaRWmmXdB0kn5kZivXET9I4h9KMem6enIvXn0KmOV21fEotrDeTo5D EQhWZDCHap0MJmC0cIXVRSpdPOrOLrzMqU+qMggPwuP7jlhKSZSE/KMydFGMVFJ3a5Vb SRLj320eseJ0x/phD3J4HL0TesuFrBSuF2EDWeAKOkRhnLDLWjF1HY1PArryMpZN5CsH l9ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CWOz1QdEXP+wpK9Ockn2qmCFEU7lhRlGRIngMhuNF5I=; b=Gzv4/oZJLHPI3uToLFLCfZU0d1XRWlW7akExLl1C73bo5+qqFbnWTOBoIAEBy06KbC f4bPG/qHNWjbQEOZvLGXEhjr80AQdgOJZA+drdpXHsChM7jefhoRw71c/r9ZtCoDQFU5 IDtYI0FC9w3caiqwY+obs503p3SGc8N0VGDOd0wqRO4iVWwmKdYTN+dHsnuVQK/cw4oR zVve2Wp9ZXeQqtqdgsjMtCVaZB9FbUdclF5xTv+4OSeSMGtZtybGLiE8/Ddd3rABeryJ gG0fBbNcNHmN/9TYXblrGYu8ULiOXykRIsEUSvDGFAydgWmWMwX8A1V8AZ2GEPSIy6Ee nY9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUFncErlHZe8a4zbe0oavzU6h88o0CBiP1w2yMVj8FXVxunVVoN LFSxVNLAWtFEgMy4hHi6rBMO4Tm8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx30svXPPJnbykZjgvmvbSmrSrly9ZkcXSPnen4EYSQMgdBr/ZklfpnfZa9QUp4R7GIFQxulg== X-Received: by 2002:a25:be88:: with SMTP id i8mr2601822ybk.118.1570634538794; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (mail-yb1-f175.google.com. [209.85.219.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 12sm683263ywu.59.2019.10.09.08.22.17 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id y204so849429yby.10 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:84ce:: with SMTP id x14mr2480392ybm.443.1570634537210; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5979d1bf0b5521c66f2f6fa31b7e1cbdddd8cea8.1570455278.git.martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com> <20191009124814.GB17712@martin-VirtualBox> In-Reply-To: From: Willem de Bruijn Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:21:40 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS,IP,NSH etc. To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: Martin Varghese , Network Development , David Miller , corbet@lwn.net, scott.drennan@nokia.com, Jiri Benc , martin.varghese@nokia.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > Yes we could. We can move these to a common place. include/net/ip_tunnels.h ? > > I think it will be preferable to work the other way around and extend > existing ip tunnel infra to add MPLS. But that may not be entirely feasible, not sure yet. Else, indeed moving such helpers to a common location sounds good.