From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED5CC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC82C6109F for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232124AbhEUKFn (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 06:05:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237333AbhEUKEy (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 06:04:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614DDC06138C for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id i7so11767774ejc.5 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/wHHEzOeyQrmNCaW2tS23FfdNlMbSDSVT0iemNZw4rg=; b=QlNbvvpjz8UXSwLR62zjWawiN1zk9Sd2x2tMJHXhosTGmBEsza/4EL9f1IyvS+d4be XKBbbQuwI/1mgtOjju8cUt2aG4o3xPXucpNQ3BqKlrdItdo+O1RzASUbfRzKiMqdTBuC BpWvYVwfhlM2LzYgubmzuEbIYSG5ASiegb6BqfUgBh6AOwJLWuCbs+FATHk31ePDcx7b 6JJgbA1N5kLuwuRTiXpccyqLzofFL0Yyh2D7l/ifQRo4UTF8BEPqVw+yeYLUyDY71PjB xAaRhssG4Av+sg9LCns1FOJcyiMkBFpKbQIgG4fOd0hzsZeYr8oFMUC/2T735+BOS+q+ qwiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/wHHEzOeyQrmNCaW2tS23FfdNlMbSDSVT0iemNZw4rg=; b=oPtR6L43a26mJOaH3go2EmPjaG2/g7/ikRVRLElIKW9B0r41hFTllgfvUdd1QVzKl9 XgWXBGF7Yggyw70//hvdHck8OHe+KfIy3pod15hLho3GHV0IYlsLJm4JRN0VaKoa30E6 81h/qHe3b3u4fAumBk2LVTHWwL6SF1Nl8KLrR4y0DV7lnOlXwAypWTb7UN+C9aUcA3eR oCreYSO3sQMif21MVYzJlLkFAhXYCHffOVj9rOGAbvpVNAqs2WER0fq13nLoIycjBVuo GwfpCUQpowfofY4c6q8lF6HGVuhMcC6DK/t1pGnx7rFHvQ6WAkLr8xquyEPkj1PtQt9b dpyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KS4rcR88nNCwsruLeb843eT0hhXRNwSe1kfvosBYkH9iOVdN9 JkrNOb/jN3z0nkSGCp/VMLE36/9zCEQC5BcLLl08bQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHDlKpumbldcnv7G8+A7rVh2SGVN1ITF5GFy0agRp6tL47lFLJezXmy1kyDCnor0NukCKS/jcpuQfYlu1NLgk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4e59:: with SMTP id g25mr9448179ejw.133.1621591356816; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:02:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210520152221.547672231@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210520152221.547672231@linuxfoundation.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:32:25 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/186] 4.4.269-rc2 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: open list , Shuah Khan , Florian Fainelli , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , linux-stable , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.269 release. > There are 186 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:21:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-= 4.4.269-rc2.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable= -rc.git linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro=E2=80=99s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.4.269-rc2 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-= rc.git * git branch: linux-4.4.y * git commit: 9d2abc11d0b5fe18f62908e3a918af52ac95b3a0 * git describe: v4.4.268-187-g9d2abc11d0b5 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.2= 68-187-g9d2abc11d0b5 ## No regressions (compared to v4.4.268-191-g580f473963dc) ## Fixes (compared to v4.4.268-191-g580f473963dc) * mips, build - gcc-10-allnoconfig - gcc-10-ar7_defconfig - gcc-10-ath79_defconfig - gcc-10-bcm47xx_defconfig - gcc-10-bcm63xx_defconfig - gcc-10-cavium_octeon_defconfig - gcc-10-defconfig - gcc-10-e55_defconfig - gcc-10-malta_defconfig - gcc-10-nlm_xlp_defconfig - gcc-10-rt305x_defconfig - gcc-10-tinyconfig - gcc-8-allnoconfig - gcc-8-ar7_defconfig - gcc-8-ath79_defconfig - gcc-8-bcm47xx_defconfig - gcc-8-bcm63xx_defconfig - gcc-8-cavium_octeon_defconfig - gcc-8-defconfig - gcc-8-e55_defconfig - gcc-8-malta_defconfig - gcc-8-nlm_xlp_defconfig - gcc-8-rt305x_defconfig - gcc-8-tinyconfig - gcc-9-allnoconfig - gcc-9-ar7_defconfig - gcc-9-ath79_defconfig - gcc-9-bcm47xx_defconfig - gcc-9-bcm63xx_defconfig - gcc-9-cavium_octeon_defconfig - gcc-9-defconfig - gcc-9-e55_defconfig - gcc-9-malta_defconfig - gcc-9-nlm_xlp_defconfig - gcc-9-rt305x_defconfig - gcc-9-tinyconfig ## Test result summary total: 36496, pass: 29277, fail: 624, skip: 6061, xfail: 534, ## Build Summary * arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org