From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF172C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9976146D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1382899AbhCBK1i (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 05:27:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1382759AbhCBKN2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 05:13:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C5FC06178C for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 02:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id jt13so34202193ejb.0 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 02:12:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9emZJGXSfS3CBcoV3moek0dr0o68xi0UvE5qBXpPUXA=; b=fr17Px/Z62oKFGYJ/W88x9bOoKKpT/UW7LHPP7GzTTUryspn3cBwYenB6BbxirCW3r XOCtCtIgvkezeRYYTG0m9S7vRfZb0U+NKoF9KTGtjklJjsgD06NXphU1asP1hXb6Kp+D ekVH4pz2whvgusZscWvubpgcqi5Qw0KtAuMgKCmoDoLitRb/PNvLqpI6ca+hE3rr6HUS fJRzAqiD31DYBZ4MSH19AliggrS3qJgAn/NMD4/rAXQksEax49z1TQWGk/SiZQhuNuVN gXXJ97iZwOrOaD1D6BLA1BXmzAR2zDnTP3W9yBOerDdyJC9OI3l6n29fxZo0vOU6UXKA KiFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9emZJGXSfS3CBcoV3moek0dr0o68xi0UvE5qBXpPUXA=; b=qi/uM/Wy1Hdg1QPSjM0IVVOyzrD74ZnrtpPqiwhhGLmfNppc9YJFkoBzME6G1tsNMg JsMu5YawCUynCc3KeSoscuXWMHhs/9hHBmLjXcrARSrYRJ67vKNuGQSyc2dchOmLBBbU ZSoJMgdipQu3B2nOndVK9/lBW5vdPBNf43AxEPuRNfSR8mZNn/lO2cOJBTvKK5uGJNUW dPtdN9lznvgxQCb+Tq9bcUiZRqDWrzkLYvYfdS8Y9faBl286e6UygvqpYBBc7XlGz904 vETxF+gFEediPpkWYdp99CLh8qrrih2GgZ0vnFESjaJQpxICPJ/I+xQF2SgTWDhRQvYy UBRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321kBofR+eINZ2AwtT2RlWbkK5t47i/0GiV4ifw+Yck7SemTwHs 87tKcj41EPKV7jmtiEMzxu/Lju9izawxANgR02Ft7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygHRWR6muKo1EKip/CdEc4MkfpNRQJIYTz00eMsp1q2b55BBcAgn3jRL2LvNtMSRKUwCewGi/MkwTQZskjB/0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7b8d:: with SMTP id s13mr20268094ejo.247.1614679956551; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 02:12:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210301193642.707301430@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:42:25 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/661] 5.10.20-rc2 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linus Torvalds , open list , Shuah Khan , Florian Fainelli , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , linux-stable , pavel@denx.de, Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , LTP List , Arnd Bergmann , Jiri Slaby Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 15:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:20:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Hi Greg and Linus, > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:45, Naresh Kamboju = wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.20 releas= e. > > > > There are 661 patches in this series, all will be posted as a respo= nse > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, pl= ease > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:34:53 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/= patch-5.10.20-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-= stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > Results from Linaro=E2=80=99s test farm. > > > Regressions detected on all devices (arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386). > > > > > > hangup01 1 TFAIL : hangup01.c:133: unexpected message 3 > > > > > > This failure is specific to stable-rc 5.10 and 5.11. > > > Test PASS on mainline and Linux next kernel. > > > > > > > I have reverted these two patches and the test case got PASS > > on Linux version 5.10.20-rc2. > > > > hangup01 1 TPASS : child process exited with status 0 > > > > Linus Torvalds > > tty: implement read_iter > > > > Linus Torvalds > > tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel po= inter > > Odd. > > Is 5.12-rc1 also failing with this test as well? 5.10 Failed 5.11 Failed 5.12 PASS This LTP pty hangup01 PASS Linux mainline and linux next. - Naresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:42:25 +0530 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 5.10 000/661] 5.10.20-rc2 review In-Reply-To: References: <20210301193642.707301430@linuxfoundation.org> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 15:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:20:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Hi Greg and Linus, > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:45, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.20 release. > > > > There are 661 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:34:53 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.20-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > Results from Linaro?s test farm. > > > Regressions detected on all devices (arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386). > > > > > > hangup01 1 TFAIL : hangup01.c:133: unexpected message 3 > > > > > > This failure is specific to stable-rc 5.10 and 5.11. > > > Test PASS on mainline and Linux next kernel. > > > > > > > I have reverted these two patches and the test case got PASS > > on Linux version 5.10.20-rc2. > > > > hangup01 1 TPASS : child process exited with status 0 > > > > Linus Torvalds > > tty: implement read_iter > > > > Linus Torvalds > > tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer > > Odd. > > Is 5.12-rc1 also failing with this test as well? 5.10 Failed 5.11 Failed 5.12 PASS This LTP pty hangup01 PASS Linux mainline and linux next. - Naresh