From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD1AC433EF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 18:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAA160EFE for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 18:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229788AbhJISI4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:08:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229546AbhJISIy (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:08:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B8FC061570 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id i20so32862457edj.10 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P5vKfi+9td8NhqpCP6I+GiD2oc/BmGL/ilhpzsfT3Ow=; b=x5eh8NbQc6Obxe+4AnG+SZCVUbY5WnMGMfN7jeJJDtdMM7S/ecm+EdD6gUFHk2ukjE JIt4zNZbaeX/R04UaBB3QFX38NvRqxOA2vTPwLIehZySTobbbD9PEgTVHqCXLtwUv1FL LQobFB75wQzBb3Moo1ciEHERr0PoEPD9dMDEqHgzqCLBAm6vRgZuwoEfzUOMnY41wFwD CcAuOX2ldEXC14AJV9k6bWQArEsAYyfHTuXxWE2UKafHeujEC0ntWCPIZdoGLSg3d7fS RBPWgix41MOrFqyoCrlyKaIkfa5x8ESsffwoVe24EUDhKePMPzw/rPsvxFwsRou5pE4b QxjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P5vKfi+9td8NhqpCP6I+GiD2oc/BmGL/ilhpzsfT3Ow=; b=5FMIMtWEXwo5GQJc4mQEzWb4WgdNBzAV056XS4Le6N4Z4MIyvdAdp66VclJxJx8aDP XOhhJSCEwJtSPSeiIRBu6b9tGTm6WuZmMY69CkSijzPfufzOFluXKLaJxNZjsxBPB4ua ujUOcj9V5lE2pcGXVfjPTdp28yYQ/ZXt4z4qrMvRlOpjPVoFHiSW59A7i1OgOCDqMnKT IYfjPxEN1Ra5eiwkcL47brZZrHDSWF+tZ/sUZjsNOt5PKlP17rLZ6EfOVVLsGqKatr8P qp+Ylj7zyhSw1LMRgaT307tTQbh8w7WU7SjpXHTUiu46TexgCBHvi/cTbmpyRdjX4Fww XJCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SvB7i3RHG9v8FSe4kp6jAvkBzCdIzAPweFMqMVA5q4cyZN2ds b4P8OH8Rkk0CT/qDLywsG5tFMpTO7MDETxndqu2PLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtOeuBviCkxf0FgD01Ay0AfL2n69BofneDxcuVFToH92Ejz6lSWxYP63CjqOzVU8fiSQHcXgPaxAvWk+AgCyI= X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf07:: with SMTP id f7mr26062474edk.288.1633802816110; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:06:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211008112713.941269121@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20211008112713.941269121@linuxfoundation.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 23:36:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 0/8] 4.9.286-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: open list , Shuah Khan , Florian Fainelli , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter , linux-stable , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 16:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.286 release. > There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:27:07 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-= 4.9.286-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable= -rc.git linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro=E2=80=99s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 4.9.286-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: b57b518625d959467e72b2a28682237a0b7973c6 * git describe: v4.9.285-9-gb57b518625d9 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.2= 85-9-gb57b518625d9 ## No regressions (compared to v4.9.285-9-gdf647e504ac8) ## No fixes (compared to v4.9.285-9-gdf647e504ac8) ## Test result summary total: 76039, pass: 60936, fail: 492, skip: 12752, xfail: 1859 ## Build Summary * arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 68 total, 68 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org