From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A726BECAAA1 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229552AbiIQQ2h (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 12:28:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53206 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229457AbiIQQ2f (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 12:28:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF5A2DAA2 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id u9so55794725ejy.5 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:28:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=kGPtTbWnqzfzSMv1jEwmY9ZgCYSsz4cFmet6Dy+GISk=; b=XLwkf8IQKFqTI0Wy3o1v3gYZOdyKLq6F9jBv5Yg+BEpjzq/PSVr41gN36ixALKXAcc w5LSqksnWn/7zWPu2bPmQJYs5WCsbFR0nAVKsTY0iBTIkgPoWdOusVLH6UbJwRsH7TCn Ec9Fn4YaXu4p37nFlER7KLdH43Dogh14cpe/jfKaE+jkXaKUoFKkHZRJSWetyC11a5E0 Xrw9vtIp2aAXLqHxnYz7HEfGq9BFP8IW4Rs7rd+aTv7c2rbOYUnj9yxVrKwm7VQUacZ9 YyHAmayOk58eapO8lXXHrtM4E0ZGpvzQD98ECJe1WYGXKReEfa4wLYOTqUIHwuHF8v/x VQLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=kGPtTbWnqzfzSMv1jEwmY9ZgCYSsz4cFmet6Dy+GISk=; b=MNzUArNs7ZkXJMO1dElISf+Cqun7fovxfuYQ/iULqFlBfT6P2utmfwfeXchlI7/+vL delvZ76uOmT+I2Cu6tnF8m48KafZdUY39b9b6KgGcqEMKWNgLq/UT57msalLLf9EGBD7 Twve6xMT6ClHJhwCW3UQqEf3mlIslG0I4pBaHi1BDINFZJzT4D2isBG2htHgkvoMowco tEP8okk2WiTG5UBPyfA36DZLB6/5JPuodnlBNGrFJ9iLiqk+zJ9IgJw3Kz1TBI09dW37 eDhXPvW5YZ/HQQmoLVgw3cIJ8TCGe+5EQovmYlmv/tDUejKwymaHfkmICt/qxIShWDo2 yvVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1NwoL36cJQqIOA771dFfd45Xy7PKm+d1IAjbuBVlwGpKKxeZp2 VVcsjHn3AJLsypxXYDNL8FWS2yOsIjUSVyXBWveTn5yhNW7oHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Nq2KuXnDUzzD/O8pvL3P9D3pnmsn9OHGtnGmnRyA5CscK8qAg+IEvQuturEHpOpkm5PtXgdMtYn5g2wP9Ks4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe46:b0:73d:939a:ec99 with SMTP id wz6-20020a170906fe4600b0073d939aec99mr7149813ejb.169.1663432111772; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220916100443.123226979@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20220916100443.123226979@linuxfoundation.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:58:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/14] 5.4.214-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 15:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.214 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.214-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.4.214-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: ba0de553122f5be5dde3102746a1060fd2737e63 * git describe: v5.4.213-15-gba0de553122f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.213-15-gba0de553122f ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.4.213) ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.213) ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.4.213) ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.213) ## Test result summary total: 95829, pass: 83292, fail: 734, skip: 11384, xfail: 419 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 334 total, 334 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 64 total, 59 passed, 5 failed * i386: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed * mips: 56 total, 56 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed * s390: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 57 total, 55 passed, 2 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org