All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/4] 5.4.219-rc1 review
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:42:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvH0rYGRX5BUq3Ut+Yk6t+xd-exZdS5CC8E_yhpo9ibFw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221016064454.327821011@linuxfoundation.org>

On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 12:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.4.219-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 5a1de46f7e7462992a5dd980fe8d06ea57b4ad17
* git describe: v5.4.218-5-g5a1de46f7e74
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.218-5-g5a1de46f7e74

## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)

## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)

## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)

## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)

## Test result summary
total: 99448, pass: 84788, fail: 1219, skip: 12965, xfail: 476

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 334 total, 334 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 64 total, 59 passed, 5 failed
* i386: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 56 total, 56 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 57 total, 55 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-17  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-16  6:46 [PATCH 5.4 0/4] 5.4.219-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 5.4 1/4] Revert "fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 5.4 2/4] mac80211: mlme: find auth challenge directly Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 5.4 3/4] wifi: mac80211: dont parse mbssid in assoc response Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 5.4 4/4] wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-16 19:19 ` [PATCH 5.4 0/4] 5.4.219-rc1 review Guenter Roeck
2022-10-17  7:12 ` Naresh Kamboju [this message]
2022-10-17  8:56 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-17 10:01 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-17 17:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-10-17 18:03 ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+G9fYvH0rYGRX5BUq3Ut+Yk6t+xd-exZdS5CC8E_yhpo9ibFw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@kernelci.org \
    --cc=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.