From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com (mail-yb1-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C9317C6 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id e184so30367315ybf.8 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=pCE60kVDw2MImA3LMLKXGPwLWoHbYh3JLP0GUT87HFqfaKmFBv/ReQSW0JJHa/Ix53 dH+UtzW9JX977Qi0MrS3OXG5uD485M/CUkNH068x00Uxuoe52+M2BjozYvWdP7TyXUlq ByKNbzCe6n4lAvFnOcfrQ3ASctplUIjZ0CTh+40kssFrI1FdW6D7pEQC4bd7q7dXi1xI Z0YFyCFhZgKWp+TkKtnp5UsUenGdtau3pTfr7bTveX32n903KMJ4gFQv4hSUlraiX18k P5OD/58Kj9LqVbwv9staYVQYt6fG58glp/46sWLLwIdoFfoZCTtNHUNG0WNk5ent5wvD XIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=FWLxrEkblAiI7rdtUKoaTOsE4pTNGquybs/4zaiVSAss57SEwMqHss4zPjCHfFw2im 3wsFwpBbbZYxzv6lhAlN6ealWl9/kw/ueBIu+9OE/wCXcDOf3UzkPhYvUfnXaj245ej0 A5m/unwOpZCElWbk7mzxH2YIkPH1KKt/CYeFmcKz/Ul21SeYw+ZAcw5qoTINmD5LDJgX GiP7U9XxmCdxVzqCYjf7K13LNpnoE0OHBhwylODVexe4pRNftBEIm8VfNsMvsYNOnW6x NGM0lFJBgusMf4eJwSY2f3YjB1kzcax8uYj8/0vVWmXsd86aFYNxhv1L3AGXcF6VuGsC vG9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lvoOe6TzGk/row9IpD310qbJvePLnrMvCqLLm5LfujzxOulyD ZxvvcFGeiZsbgHW8ebHGyPkfpc5E0RUtRkmluitL2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKT2UmpuK+kDxqDiEIkG8TF0esYpFi4IVr32ervm1z3rjq6TIlEmUWrJNsgH3MWaBpO5f9Rfu/L0y/NukH9mc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4705:0:b0:65d:43f8:5652 with SMTP id u5-20020a254705000000b0065d43f85652mr28527025yba.389.1654597683604; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220607162504.7fd5a92a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:57:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606 To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux ARM , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Raghuram Thammiraju , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Roman Gushchin , Vasily Averin , Qian Cai Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Shakeel, > > > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please? If that does not fail, then you could > > > bisect between that and next-20220606 ... > > > > > > > This is already reported at > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know > > the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc > > address). > > Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it > seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report. > Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual > address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj(). > > Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set > proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"? yes. You are right ! 19ee3818b7c6 ("net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations") After reverting this single commit I am able to boot arm64 successfully. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C8BC43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:32:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GWRKKO/059y3CAteO0fUJMr8TRzt76ET7RVnB3hznEY=; b=LRNWWcu3YJB3R1 b9vkcproUiOo7NdKUZ3N5oPwA7z7EBj2lZXFLFlLj/Mcth6om3X4OqdJqzwAUAPGlAsk3Ih8VNyzA XRUiw52DoRt1Ku9YYBsU6aigHycC+NzC80YR8gSzw3jnz4IX7Em8bEyjRgrpEStDsursCQIWH9vVJ LgS/nv/hyQNUDFUJqODk1wiewWGm+HPyGkX0vvvm61IcPblzK/wllYbojI84kHS7AXUYPDLu4Tdy5 xgR5Vp2kc+hfjkleZzhNG68RcBZkI6GPQzIEif/f1/IWetp041WMxapidHXvxlMQxAddptyXrd+dz 99lYENLb92zzLZlA0upA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyWUZ-006ff4-G8; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:31:21 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyWRQ-006eGu-PT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:28:06 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id w2so30385033ybi.7 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=pCE60kVDw2MImA3LMLKXGPwLWoHbYh3JLP0GUT87HFqfaKmFBv/ReQSW0JJHa/Ix53 dH+UtzW9JX977Qi0MrS3OXG5uD485M/CUkNH068x00Uxuoe52+M2BjozYvWdP7TyXUlq ByKNbzCe6n4lAvFnOcfrQ3ASctplUIjZ0CTh+40kssFrI1FdW6D7pEQC4bd7q7dXi1xI Z0YFyCFhZgKWp+TkKtnp5UsUenGdtau3pTfr7bTveX32n903KMJ4gFQv4hSUlraiX18k P5OD/58Kj9LqVbwv9staYVQYt6fG58glp/46sWLLwIdoFfoZCTtNHUNG0WNk5ent5wvD XIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=1R3I0lKsa7Lgvp9cHdEf+MXcuiRNDYz5ENOMGRjkOtotrYm5ufDRcbBLgxmpO3MNeH /PdNC5jp7/GJMkSHVnRzk5Cws9iRA+gCohN9K22WNVzBvnJC/woA1nTMt9m2yS825IH7 6dpTj0FdZgAP7F65CRL0CAkSnB49eTGFQjnzE7Iu02qjai1bWhTLsfrfOvwdvdqyZ+7Q g4xVlkdjAA8Ps/r3hO5KruclVfyM1tKue0r3wTzd1ESIzKxUV5zJsvWHjPXJ62b9uHIP DPYwFwTFa3ed+D+mJvQLgYtO7Gn3JDUAwGeara3a1UfkmeG1ewuuT+J/+nZLY4GM/ZiC C15Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53087C4eFdhpSb5tlAzPRJLOhzebLzj0GhEzpyc5FtOTkCLKGlVZ 2FkcoKI94DmE2dzd3Nes/m/aRM8k5hNHR1UeA5scWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKT2UmpuK+kDxqDiEIkG8TF0esYpFi4IVr32ervm1z3rjq6TIlEmUWrJNsgH3MWaBpO5f9Rfu/L0y/NukH9mc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4705:0:b0:65d:43f8:5652 with SMTP id u5-20020a254705000000b0065d43f85652mr28527025yba.389.1654597683604; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220607162504.7fd5a92a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:57:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606 To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux ARM , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Raghuram Thammiraju , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Roman Gushchin , Vasily Averin , Qian Cai X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220607_032804_866045_7FB845D8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Shakeel, > > > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please? If that does not fail, then you could > > > bisect between that and next-20220606 ... > > > > > > > This is already reported at > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know > > the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc > > address). > > Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it > seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report. > Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual > address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj(). > > Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set > proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"? yes. You are right ! 19ee3818b7c6 ("net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations") After reverting this single commit I am able to boot arm64 successfully. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel