From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6C9C433F5 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4614C60F21 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240236AbhIFIvJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 04:51:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239548AbhIFIvI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 04:51:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74CAC061575 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id i21so12070646ejd.2 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YxXQTshxIsbfAl89WtIQKw+Tm3yOn99fm9Kqix9sEs4=; b=V1PsecuWiackqz4fr1D6pSuEkJwHJGTg6WKDk6WUH0ngOwEM1tombwa+Wo/Kkxr0jv Ce/rrmx81JRm9ZqM0e+eu9lQk+ZopOTjJrguL1KgZqHPe7eKBp9+S9tpib9oaScE0rbh v0JcOPnx2n5+pEjL8JpTCI5voTtYllWuUyD8jEQIDxNmYJuspo+z4SejBCsv6RsME6T8 zG7pUdlE86CdIISrYFu/hBOtloZa91B5/VhFg3UoJAQR6rh+j+sIcoycmW/MEi8r5EYY dldMJ1Xcx7LexypKtC00cqr86UMP0ulQBsulrpyzcamd+X5BoaNGxL0uro+B7aIfoJ0q 4l5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YxXQTshxIsbfAl89WtIQKw+Tm3yOn99fm9Kqix9sEs4=; b=D5ZBd067QhEGNzvuZbwkZjgjjB1kWBbnM743wKFFt1KSwNuRuys3hEBViP82bsc27V AwisOwkbwkZDCbsXo9VWryAkpR8t93iL6zvXqt3VG+I+0UkD5+sD0Uw84tznSmSfugK5 TNOdP5bBAikgYrmJs7cSMLcmB3p4werJa/zTer/qQ6A5NJiCitAvbRn6kwnNDP24CxBj 0hbHJrgMMFYutAzSr2CAx68dmMnNDxnaxjmqe9m4xNxDo8qFKYJCNA12Y5k+KZSxX1qm fDgovYqHW//wtuBNcKVzPXHZ9GFo02zon3sGMFeYeMpTIC6FrZd+vYVzcEN/6VGbw0AN UW3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gujvHq3A92b263XCy3E2jP8VgGB1i7ovVM++kt3POj1gWQHYh iD+QIiUm1TpbE9tH9wE1ISzmU15/cvoP/QEQdFP3v+B5IGxIGw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJzT1V0vNO4H/k+xnAI7Yh55AhQQ+U/iK9heibJ2xmjL2vxxyE8zxVGkc0i3GwBtlf5ZwAVDvRYbNLYNMu0P4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:318b:: with SMTP id 11mr12690482ejy.493.1630918202321; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 01:50:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:19:50 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: kernel/kexec_file.o: failed: Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.unlikely. To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, open list , linux-stable , Sasha Levin , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14 > > > > with gcc-11 for powerpc architecture. > > > > > > > Is this a regression? Has this compiler ever been able to build this > > > arch like this? > > > > Yes. It is a regression with gcc-11. > > > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASSED > > Ah, ok, and does 5.14 or newer work properly? No. stable rc Linux 5.14.1-rc1 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED stable rc Linux 5.14.1-rc1 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASS I will check Linux mainline and Linux next and get back to you. - Naresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mNAKJ-000HF8-QF for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:50:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id me10so12008917ejb.11 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:19:50 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: kernel/kexec_file.o: failed: Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.unlikely. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, open list , linux-stable , Sasha Levin , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14 > > > > with gcc-11 for powerpc architecture. > > > > > > > Is this a regression? Has this compiler ever been able to build this > > > arch like this? > > > > Yes. It is a regression with gcc-11. > > > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASSED > > Ah, ok, and does 5.14 or newer work properly? No. stable rc Linux 5.14.1-rc1 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED stable rc Linux 5.14.1-rc1 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASS I will check Linux mainline and Linux next and get back to you. - Naresh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec