[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Le 06/03/2012 00:03, Tom Rini a ?crit :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The following changes since commit
>> 3513896e57c6757c411e0633ccb5da08c36ad7d4:
>> ? Robert Delien (1):
>> ? ? ? ? Fix erroneous 32-bit access to hw_clkctrl_frac0 and
>> hw_clkctrl_frac1 registers
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> ? git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master
>>
>> Matt Porter (2):
>> ? ? ? SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support
>> ? ? ? SPL: Enable YMODEM support on BeagleBone and AM335x EVM
>>
>> Tom Rini (6):
>> ? ? ? .gitignore: Add .su files
>> ? ? ? config.mk: Make cc-option create a file under include/generated
>> ? ? ? config.mk: Check for -fstack-usage support
>> ? ? ? spl.c: Use __noreturn decorator
>> ? ? ? README: document more SPL config options
>> ? ? ? SPL: Add README.omap3
>>
>> ?.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 +
>> ?Makefile ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?2 +-
>> ?README ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 69
>> +++++++++++++++++++++----
>> ?arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile ? ? | ? ?3 +
>> ?arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c ? ? ? ?| ? 10 +++-
>> ?arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl_ymodem.c | ? 76
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ?arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?3 +
>> ?common/Makefile ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?3 +
>> ?config.mk ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 11 +++--
>> ?doc/SPL/README.omap3 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 74
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ?include/configs/am335x_evm.h ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 +
>> ?lib/Makefile ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?3 +
>> ?12 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>> ?create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl_ymodem.c
>> ?create mode 100644 doc/SPL/README.omap3
>>
>>
>> With the documentation / related changes, Wolfgang said on IRC he was OK
>> for now with the additional SPL bits going on.
>
>
> All these commits are feature additions posted after the merge window,
> aren't they?

The first part was a little late (Jan 31st) and that was held up until
Wolfgang was happy with the second set.

-- 
Tom