From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Rini <tom.rini@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:54:09 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] MAKEALL
In-Reply-To: <201110181431.18491.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <20111018062310.61320140797D@gemini.denx.de>
	<201110181301.57390.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<CA+M6bXnkJ_BcjokHWoeFqJT+K8xjiuOFbfGNrMfZCfty1YOU-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<201110181431.18491.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <CA+M6bX=U-gaTJR3YZFB159tHqcBJg3zBL0y5n+Neu5WCwYG1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2011 13:58:22 Tom Rini wrote:
>> If we're going to throw out feature requests, I'd like more than one
>> SoC family support.
>> I've got a wrapper around MAKEALL right now to build omap3 then omap4
>> then davinci.
>
> hmm, actually doesn't the newish -s flag do what you want ?
> ? ? ? ?./MAKEALL -s omap3 arm

So, -s omap3 -s omap4 looks like it does what I want, -s omap3,omap4 (what I
first guessed) didn't.  So just another vote for more / better docs
that I of course
should help to provide.  Maybe it's time for at least a doc/README.MAKEALL?

-- 
Tom