From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp6nr-0007No-U6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:54:12 +0200 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so1440690ywe.6 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:49:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LyVW2oimTSIuVEHnKagUGRfEajkzA3q4re84cLwh9pI=; b=aVjsNjYp6merZsUHENal8tN9ylAPlWKwqHw9glh+zqxFIGAUEMFKC+Rgzl62uxX9NJ CB78oKUKT3wLdcRyZ5pOdwkuiUaJtFWYRjTKPO5Xcc1CI8icC+jjnIUIdH9jrnpESjjO 8P1w0aWKdJcuCmMEJcIB6iP2ru+jQAExG0aXM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.131.73 with SMTP id hp9mr1164038icc.238.1312498187442; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.228.73 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:49:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F563@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <03d062a7104f31d03893833485ec3836c07e8f90.1312469790.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> <1312494646.3169.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F4C1@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1312495815.3169.9.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F563@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:49:47 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tom Rini To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:54:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org >> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >> Phil Blundell >> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed >> support for glibc recipes >> >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org >> > > [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf >> Of >> > > Phil Blundell >> > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM >> > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer >> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed >> > > support for glibc recipes >> > > >> > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote: >> > > > From: Nitin A Kamble >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble >> > > >> > > This commit message is very terse. =A0Why is this change necessary? >> > >> > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I >> will update the commit message in the tree. >> >> Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then? >> > It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this suppor= t file is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of the code in= multiple layers. Part of the answer here is that obsolete / etc things don't belong in the core, but in other layers that need them. My read on things is that we've removed glibc in favor of eglibc... --=20 Tom