Can I submit simple patches like this to the primary ML?

[peter.senna@gmail.com (Peter Senna Tschudin)]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Vin?cius Tinti <viniciustinti@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 02:16:51AM -0200, Vin?cius Tinti wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:48:43AM -0200, Vin?cius Tinti wrote:
> >> >> This is a simple patch that initializes a function with NULL to
> avoid some
> >> >> compiler warnings. In such cases should I proceed as a normal patch
> or it is
> >> >> better to send to another ML like to one for trivial patches?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Tinti
> >> >
> >> >> >From a391789bf44afbdbe2a7b3c76301b5ece9f72475 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> >> >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Vin=C3=ADcius=20Tinti?= <viniciustinti@gmail.com>
> >> >> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:35:34 -0200
> >> >> Subject: [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Fix uninitialized function do_reloc
> >> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >> >>
> >> >> Explicit initializes do_reloc function with NULL. Later the function
> is
> >> >> either proper initialized of an error issued.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vin?cius Tinti <viniciustinti@gmail.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  arch/x86/tools/relocs.c | 2 +-
> >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> >> >> index 0c2fae8..1d533f1 100644
> >> >> --- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> >> >> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> >> >> @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static void emit_relocs(int as_text, int
> use_real_mode)
> >> >>       int i;
> >> >>       int (*write_reloc)(uint32_t, FILE *) = write32;
> >> >>       int (*do_reloc)(struct section *sec, Elf_Rel *rel, Elf_Sym
> *sym,
> >> >> -                     const char *symname);
> >> >> +                     const char *symname) = NULL;
> >> >
> >> > I think you need to get an updated version of the compiler as this
> patch
> >> > should not be needed at all.  It doesn't cause a warning here for me
> >> > without it.
> >>
> >> In fact it causes a warning on Clang which complains that:
> >>
> >>    arch/x86/tools/relocs.c:977:6: warning: variable 'do_reloc' is used
> >> uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
> >> [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> >
> > I suggest you file a bug with clang, gcc doesn't have this problem at
> > all as obviously, if you look at the code, that variable can never be
> > used uninitialized.
>
> I can simply turn down this kind of warning.
>
> >> I think there is not a problem on the current code but to avoid
> >> further problems I believe it is worth to initialize this function
> >> with NULL.
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > Don't paper over bugs in the compiler with kernel code changes for no
> > good reason :)
>
> Agreed. But whenever I find a warning in GCC during the build what
> should I do with it?
> Can I simply send it to the main ml?
>
If you believe your patch is correct, and if checkpatch.pl doesn't complain
about your patch, then get_maintainers.pl will tell you the people and
mailing lists you should send your patch to.


>
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
>
> --
> Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>



-- 
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150129/b15f1fbc/attachment-0001.html