From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA517A for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id z7-20020a17090abd8700b001df78c7c209so5509617pjr.1 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wMBWkCffbBwysChLpTvWBp9qoFOKgowkBCTbVVltEvc=; b=Tgo/QWUS67DuIrrV7tAltNApvOhIatkqkxvsSUL5cgee/8bSFEVskiqtezbpCcOIvQ 3BVcC6NG1dGHaShAupmErhkcq5mE1cmJbnoTDHHx5LkRYIzVRhGRMvgZmsA8Y8bs6RfO zgWUHlaYMR21iG2oAZVM8tXAZGCSilGtKRDSBToa3N1LO+9Aw7AX6RZrRbIDBjVpPCC6 29wGcZlvtJn4nYn6uV2zUgh9I+GSBetyZCcb75v1RdQAW0l29IRg8R1oxNsj50qczIOx a38cym4NODlIiEbiM2Z6kolcegymkZLsCxD7fE5tjXax6TvCJOxOJBPEeS5u1QutZsPf DwCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wMBWkCffbBwysChLpTvWBp9qoFOKgowkBCTbVVltEvc=; b=YVYGXZJJlOyILT1rFmASNTHArJBeupDh1uQW1KLF2MUX81NVcAIORIGcZ+G9GLZf5G fQYNLORoN8BzAcRFpl3Bvxa34BXTzbPHAS5Wz9cOiULqtKUclrv2dbHPS0Qyj4HbFG0H wjnmXvgMlUT44lgx2WNdgI3G3Hvd/fAwvdd3QatprovmUlwrMh57nNJvURrj3Z66LqtZ 0LV0PQQz/d49gtnkM5d03WKO5HEMPPAZPMiLhdCcBL69cZ177rkFAHUj9q7b2P9XcmcD I0tkMYEFnqOZUfuZVaBakKcM9mS3UwaQDmmkEIA4BoJ4B+Jh+JCDmiSLaBZyMhhGuPQT qUvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532giw/7i3i46PJZ2yE2wnLd1Mrk4CjY4qqF9CpRGI/G2Ra9EPhz IU72TahyUEHQjPpgn+DhduGBxTCcD4SI6ja89mOwDLDAgwc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoioopodj5CYQ+VjOH/KtaPnv/DPN35CrRlNdT5BSBeegG6t4ZB+jBoPV8QYU1LtattcGa8Is+6sp9dGPxj1k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c8f:b0:15e:ab1c:591b with SMTP id t15-20020a1709028c8f00b0015eab1c591bmr27554255plo.171.1652877953485; Wed, 18 May 2022 05:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Geliang Tang Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 20:45:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 00/17] for bpf-next To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Geliang Tang , MPTCP Upstream Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matt, Matthieu Baerts =E4=BA=8E2022=E5=B9=B45=E6= =9C=8818=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=B8=89 18:59=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > Hi Geliang, > > Thank you for this series. > > On 18/05/2022 08:10, Geliang Tang wrote: > > - The first 10 patches is for bpf-next v5. > > - Rebased the "BPF packet scheduler" series on export branch. > > - base-commit: df896c77f02a ("DO-NOT-MERGE: git markup: features > > net-next-next"), export/20220517T155019 > > Does this correspond to what I should get if I apply all the Squash-to > patch you sent yesterday? > Or are there differences on top of that? This series addresses all BPF maintainers=E2=80=98 comments for v4. It make= s the squash-to patches I sent yesterday superseded. I found it's hard to send them as squash-to patches because there are too many differences. So I sent this new series. I think it's much easier for Mat to review and upstream. > > On my side, it is easier to apply squash-to patch and re-apply an > updated series which is already in our tree. > Of course if the conflicts are complex, you can send your version on a > public Git repo for me to compare. I suggest we skip merging this version into our export branch. I guess BPF maintainers will give some comments for this v5 too. When this series is accepted at last, then I'll split them as squash-to patches, and send to you for merging into our export branch. Thanks, -Geliang > > Cheers, > Matt > -- > Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions > www.tessares.net >