From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Anibal Limon" Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:57:56 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kernelci] KernelCI API Auth Token Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001cad1b0578e846fa" List-ID: To: Guillaume Tucker Cc: kernelci@groups.io, info@kernelci.org, milo@milo.name, Nicolas Dechesne , Anmar Oueja , Fathi Boudra --0000000000001cad1b0578e846fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 11:01, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > Hi Anibal, > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Anibal Limon > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:31, Anibal Limon >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:29, Guillaume Tucker < >>> guillaume.tucker@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI I've sent an API token to Anibal with only HTTP GET permissions. >>>> >>> >>> Right, I tested it for my personal usage and works, thanks Guillaume. >>> >>> I requested a token for read/write over qcom-lt/jobs. >>> >> >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> Any update on get a token for r/w on qcom-lt/jobs? >> > > Could you please explain what you and the Qualcomm Landing Team > intend to do with this token? > I explained before but may be I wasn't clear. We run a LAVA testjob [1] generated by LinaroCI [2], the LinaroCI job get the latest KernelCI qcom-lt/integration [3] binaries and build an Android boot image with our own ramdisk and test scripts like bootrr (boot regression tests) for QC boards. We need a KernelCI token to push back the test results via /test API into qcom-lt/integration [3]. Regards, Anibal [1] https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/1895654 [2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/lt-qcom-linux-integration/ [3] https://kernelci.org/job/qcom-lt/branch/integration-linux-qcomlt/ > In principle it seems fine to have a non-LAVA lab provide some > KernelCI test results, but it would be good to have it explained > on this mailing list so we're all aware of what this involves. > > Best wishes, > Guillaume > > >> >>> Regards, >>> Anibal >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:16 PM Anibal Limon >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> + Milo >>>>> + info at kernelci.org >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 03:13, Milosz Wasilewski < >>>>> milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 01:37, Anibal Limon >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I want to access the KernelCI API to get information about the >>>>>> QCOMLT builds, I have a couple of questions, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > What is the process to get a KernelCI API auth token? >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess asking the ML is a good start. Back in the days when Milo was >>>>>> working on the code I got one directly from him. I'm not sure who is >>>>>> generating tokens these days. >>>>>> >>>>>> milosz >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Fathi, Anmar, >>>>>> > Do we have a KernelCI auth token available on LinaroCI? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>> > Anibal >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> --0000000000001cad1b0578e846fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 11:01, = Guillaume Tucker <guillaum= e.tucker@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Anibal,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Anibal L= imon <aniba= l.limon@linaro.org> wrote:


On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:31, Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>= ; wrote:


On Tue, 16 Oc= t 2018 at 15:29, Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI I= 've sent an API token to Anibal with only HTTP GET permissions.

Right, I tested it for my personal usage and= works, thanks Guillaume.

I requested a token for = read/write over qcom-lt/jobs.

=
Hi Guillaume,

Any update on get a token for r= /w on qcom-lt/jobs?

= Could you please explain what you and the Qualcomm Landing Team
i= ntend to do with this token?

I explained before but may be I wasn't clear.

We run a LAVA testjob [1] generated by LinaroCI [2], the Li= naroCI job get the latest KernelCI qcom-lt/integration [3] binaries and
build an Android boot image with our own ramdisk and test scripts li= ke bootrr (boot regression tests) for QC boards.

W= e need a KernelCI token to push back the test results via /test API into qc= om-lt/integration [3].

Regards,
Anibal

[2]=C2=A0https://ci.linaro.org/job/lt-qcom-linux-integration/


In principle it seems fine to have a non-LAVA lab pr= ovide some
KernelCI test results, but it would be good to have it= explained
on this mailing list so we're all aware of what th= is involves.

Best wishes,
Guillaum= e
=C2=A0=C2=A0
Regards,
Anibal
=C2=A0

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:16 PM Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org>= wrote:
+ Milo=C2=A0
+ info at kernelci.org

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 03:13, Milosz Wasilewski <milosz.wasilewski@linaro.or= g> wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 01:37, Anibal Limon <anibal.limon@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to access the KernelCI API to get information about the QCOMLT= builds, I have a couple of questions,
>
> What is the process to get a KernelCI API=C2=A0 auth token?

I guess asking the ML is a good start. Back in the days when Milo was
working on the code I got one directly from him. I'm not sure who is generating tokens these days.

milosz

>
> Fathi, Anmar,
> Do we have a KernelCI auth token available on LinaroCI?
>
> Regards,
> Anibal
>



--0000000000001cad1b0578e846fa--