From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dillaman Subject: Re: hammer 0.94.10 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:33:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: dillaman@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:35139 "EHLO mail-lf0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752631AbdATXdm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:33:42 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n124so66523173lfd.2 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:33:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Should we wait for that last issue or is hammer ready for QE to start their > own round of testing? RBD is good-to-go for QE -- no need to wait for that issue to get backported. -- Jason