From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8351C433F5 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nExGK-0007cb-1k for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 12:48:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEvbW-0001n4-Hp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:02:02 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:20154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEvbU-0003Q2-IO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:02:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643731318; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ec2cGKzwPDgJ95xXCUatow9ne0HB995uNwaV4LzKg+Q=; b=flx179d6AYth3qry1kOMM8X2R5SsYHBiokauaGlggeltO9zaB0zfKY7DZ+xT2iiF8dneZ5 kgjbC+Y4SyC2w0M9yMnBA3Kaq5h3iFiqkGm7dvxmN87WiHztm1+q3s9n9jOi4mXKyKeODC OD0dzc16UyKzp0rMU9xw4qtPmwCXUI0= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-237-CPTW6E6NNiOe4Fbdfi7xYQ-1; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:01:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CPTW6E6NNiOe4Fbdfi7xYQ-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id d185-20020a1fe6c2000000b0031e50f180f9so2729501vkh.19 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:01:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ec2cGKzwPDgJ95xXCUatow9ne0HB995uNwaV4LzKg+Q=; b=eY821dm7bT9USS63hOERhoKw12kMJKWBGeb9Q72Va5ntvtNbK1+Hm7x69QTPLJaw27 vyKkFuRsdP61uG5/COkBkvkVIwg/HzM5dbFnSOzAuYXLnbCEza17vwgFCSFd7nVtuyP0 wepWdSlA5o4EB28zAxwYm0kiH17DLkkCC0yYGc3haAhJWYpeU1UHr6VVY76Ejjqtweqk O+3QIhHnv3kd7f+tLYBWuKZF+TLpzzdykM8zDC3If0kpDbSTe+Fqw6hZx+1HeXZZ8dVo WdfdrvFYv4wgkj/WCSZNUZK+ujws5W7SsXES6IwADf1eW/phqF67+sppGykcwlr9jr5M w8KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53242IozTKnfHHb0ysjBr8Wk073mkJlebE8BpdnNd0oM56weRL0F sFte9q+BDb5JWqUgnj1/TZlgEGUnwPOpVallHNjfYPGp9FJ4842XduV53flXung0kLHQYoZTQEk jvYfU5FbDkCWsZhMdyRztWuB2e8j+oSQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:883:: with SMTP id 3mr10814849vkf.38.1643731315066; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:01:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWXvHVAKsuhby5yaYdf0NTcPVqKCpVe3jvPJmrMcD2DuETtsOG7k2LyQ0C68689JmtDCEMcXZEkPj7vrGVelc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:883:: with SMTP id 3mr10814731vkf.38.1643731314305; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:01:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6c90ca3d-eaec-d7e8-5941-4deb83b58fd0@redhat.com> <87zgnp4b32.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <875yqd6zib.fsf@linaro.org> <20220125092011.dq2t4ryl632vrvsf@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20220201073139.7896e10b@elisabeth> <20220201112720.4ac9b8df@elisabeth> <87wnieygjp.fsf@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <87wnieygjp.fsf@linaro.org> From: Cleber Rosa Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:01:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=crosa@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=crosa@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.081, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Beraldo Leal , Markus Armbruster , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , QEMU Developers , Stefano Brivio , Gerd Hoffmann , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 6:25 AM Alex Benn=C3=A9e wr= ote: > > We have up to now tried really hard as a project to avoid building and > hosting our own binaries to avoid theoretical* GPL compliance issues. > This is why we've ended up relying so much on distros to build and host > binaries we can use. Most QEMU developers have their own personal zoo of > kernels and userspaces which they use for testing. I use custom kernels > with a buildroot user space in initramfs for example. We even use the > qemu advent calendar for a number of our avocado tests but we basically > push responsibility for GPL compliance to the individual developers in > that case. > > *theoretical in so far I suspect most people would be happy with a > reference to an upstream repo/commit and .config even if that is not to > the letter of the "offer of source code" required for true compliance. > Yes, it'd be fine (great, really!) if a lightweight distro (or kernels/initrd) were to be maintained and identified as an "official" QEMU pick. Putting the binar= ies in the source tree though, brings all sorts of compliance issues. The downloading of the images at test "setup time" is still a better approa= ch, given that tests will simply skip if the download is not possible. - Cleber.