From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com [209.85.208.52]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.9844.1603895498021782689 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:31:38 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kU3U7mlj; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.208.52, mailfrom: martin.jansa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id dn5so5340466edb.10 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:31:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H2SH+TcVLGqw+jrC06hWVwrBZxod5SyCONl6SebewKA=; b=kU3U7mljfdBFWEkXXmTuyX/1gfZ+IHemJSMKn+fm9lD5lfXZjjUJYzcMaAWP3Y0its AaNcCSLF40ySPa6eG9x1V/sjq7SppCqS/FhNeygmfTNrHeB11sz3yfWreNMbKSCKiQ8B zIsrNRTnMJMOtNLVieknMWYytE1Oz2XG5bsTzrIaEH2Z+3r3AOBIZGUy7tgF8kUJ7mbZ 1d+V1ccYUazngb39EZ6Rj4bEKh3TgS8IA3Ovg2A97c35bnETqoQg220Oi4TJ/C693HWE Syx1UIQ6sGHhnvNqEJ/J3XodQZJP2kNgLjh2I9AVcvHVa0c162LOiCMtq2+9lLy16ZES 79Dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=H2SH+TcVLGqw+jrC06hWVwrBZxod5SyCONl6SebewKA=; b=qcgH5E4jgdTMhT0704NikIKN2OhuO1RdKIKEUOVbjcrKEadkMJtZ05wGb5k3dF5lM1 sm5HRizZv4iXycukdd8uC1Usp0aRjvQHjPsIWNHnkydgkRbYMr+vSK3RofokqYq1SV2O zLRqQGu9z67Bz8dk3Ceo8nhObBg+/nccR3Brv0CAYyxFZz4mEjFvpB6dRw7P8iKenOdI qU6OzEv/OSqD24lTEuCiejUy2Qbk3zuYs3K+4wPHOmNZRPwxmD50sxYP3RyQJ8QYdsoy X3miUBNycCQl2NLwRUYhJHspPv+YCR+1fg9peaKvRZZeSSYJDbf4lab6vgYcb5YazDFY DAig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326SoQkUI5RYzbS+mlvzx6fBAVHmC70FKDbx5rfv50y+glWm+oi ke4b4Q9JWkT/svY4CkNv76ak/mziSXuLoWnLbUc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8Yw+ye3Wr9V1tc2V241vswqLIg6x1Xtl52RdWsLbx0NfewfKuP+6vogz7WBfYYf891aBMxXOO+yv0NyNuqvQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1457:: with SMTP id d23mr7802962edx.311.1603895496498; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:31:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201027092433.mtsr6bucqhzitixf@jama> In-Reply-To: From: "Martin Jansa" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:31:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core][dunfell 00/14] Pull request (cover letter only) To: Steve Sakoman , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005362ba05b2bc054a" --0000000000005362ba05b2bc054a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The script just finished, I've uploaded the results here: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca There is a lot of changes compared to master, but mostly because I didn't have ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET set to thumb in this run. That helped to reveal one issue in meta/conf/machine/include/tune-arm9tdmi.inc which most likely exists in master as well (wasn't detected before just because ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET). https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/diff/scripts/tune/log.fake-arm9tdmi.arm9tdmi?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca And the meta/conf/machine/include/tune-supersparc.inc is failing like it did in master before removal in: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=861519337b6e5e986c3c4b8ba253e8339caf0805 which you probably intentionally didn't backport to dunfell. https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/diff/scripts/tune/log.fake-supersparc?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca I'll trigger it once more with thumb enabled to better show what's the difference from master. Cheers, On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:34 PM Martin Jansa wrote: > Hi Steve, > > it's from this branch: > > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/tune-test > > I've already started it on top of dunfell with these fixes backported, > will report back when it's finished (will take at least rest of today to > finish). > > Cheers, > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:03 PM Steve Sakoman wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:24 PM Martin Jansa >> wrote: >> >> > Did you run tune/test.sh script with these on dunfell or do you want me >> to? >> >> No, I didn't. I'm not familiar with that script. Can you point me in >> the right direction? >> >> > It looks OK, but would be good to confirm that it fixes all issues >> > currently in dunfell. >> >> Agreed! >> >> Steve >> > --0000000000005362ba05b2bc054a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The script just finished, I've uploaded the results he= re:

There is a lot of changes compared to ma= ster, but mostly because I didn't have ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET set to thumb= in this run.

That helped to reveal one issue in
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-arm9tdmi.inc
which mo= st likely exists in master as well (wasn't detected before just because= ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET).

And the=C2=A0met= a/conf/machine/include/tune-supersparc.inc is failing like it did in master= before removal in:
which you probably intentionally didn&= #39;t backport to dunfell.

I'll trigger it once m= ore with thumb enabled to better show what's the difference from master= .

Cheers,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:34 PM Mar= tin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.= com> wrote:
Hi Steve,

it's from this branch:=

I've already started it on top of dunfell with these fixes bac= kported, will report back when it's finished (will take at least rest o= f today to finish).

Cheers,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2= 020 at 3:03 PM Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> wrote:
Hi Martin,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:24 PM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you run tune/test.sh script with these on dunfell or do you want m= e to?

No, I didn't.=C2=A0 I'm not familiar with that script.=C2=A0 Can yo= u point me in
the right direction?

> It looks OK, but would be good to confirm that it fixes all issues
> currently in dunfell.

Agreed!

Steve
--0000000000005362ba05b2bc054a--