Probably as lld isn't supported as well:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/e39288193fcdf3a36dbc49b78e6c9bf86a764e31

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 9:19 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:04 PM Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > * since the upgrade to 249.1 in:
> >
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=323ec445dfe22860cd450c303db5ed8fcb4e791c
> >   the builds with ld-is-gold are failing with:
> >
> >   [17/21] Generating linuxx64.elf.stub with a custom command
> >   FAILED: src/boot/efi/linuxx64.elf.stub
> >
>  /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/x86_64-oe-linux-ld
> -o src/boot/efi/linuxx64.elf.stub -T
> /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/elf_x86_64_efi.lds
> -shared -Bsymbolic -nostdlib -znocombreloc --build-id=sha1 -L
> /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib
> /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o
> src/boot/efi/string-util-fundamental.c.o src/boot/efi/disk.c.o
> src/boot/efi/graphics.c.o src/boot/efi/measure.c.o src/boot/efi/pe.c.o
> src/boot/efi/secure-boot.c.o src/boot/efi/util.c.o src/boot/efi/linux.c.o
> src/boot/efi/splash.c.o src/boot/efi/stub.c.o -lefi -lgnuefi
> /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/../lib/x86_64-oe-linux/11.2.0/libgcc.a
> >
>  /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/systemd-boot/249.1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/x86_64-oe-linux-ld:
> internal error in segment_precedes, at ../../gold/layout.cc:3721
> >   [18/21] Generating boot.c.o with a custom command
> >   ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> >   WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command.
> >
> >   as reported in:
> >   https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154246
> >
> >   work around this by using ld.bfd when ld-is-gold is in DISTRO_FEATURES
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot_249.1.bb | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot_249.1.bb
> b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot_249.1.bb
> > index d767b5bf8d..18f4fe55ce 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot_249.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot_249.1.bb
> > @@ -19,11 +19,13 @@ objcopy = ${@meson_array('OBJCOPY', d)}
> >  EOF
> >  }
> >
> > +EFI_LD = "${@d.getVar('LD').split()[0]}"
> > +
> >  EXTRA_OEMESON += "-Defi=true \
> >                    -Dgnu-efi=true \
> >                    -Defi-includedir=${STAGING_INCDIR}/efi \
> >                    -Defi-libdir=${STAGING_LIBDIR} \
> > -                  -Defi-ld=${@ d.getVar('LD').split()[0]} \
> > +                  -Defi-ld=${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES',
> 'ld-is-gold', 'ld.bfd', '${EFI_LD}', d)} \
>
> Could this just be set to ld.bfd in all cases?
>