Any comment about this RFC?

Should I send rebased version?

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
Hello Martin,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> This RFC doesn't implement it all, but it makes naming all the artifacts in
> consistent way a bit easier. If there is an agreement that OE should support
> the naming scenario described above, I'll submit the rest of the changes.

I think it all makes sense and if we preserve current behavior as
default I see it as a very good addition :-)

I didn't test the patches myself and I'd like to do a more extensive
test once you send the full patchset.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750