From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64A6719DD for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2017 07:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id o81so1464783wmb.0 for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 00:20:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tL4TkKiSiRYRj1uz8KnqzhEfgLMItQcSWoP9inuZ0Ds=; b=VY93P2AeYuHPYhhnfocd5w7XFdhfCPqks3sfU2Ln7cb3xYNDHJuR9ZUtJtc55Frfrn RIwZqc0eCsJZgJ8DUrJ8NFTviO/d272u+r0h5Agtf8TGkRZwZBboRdKAo1PpdjH8Rkjp gp2az47IFfM/7BJACoAXlS9c8+TB7XWzC57ryVbPdj0/aKnl6dM1AmunR47BhiCyRNYC +TZ7duQbKd7Ok2r7WDn6nUopE4LYdVT2X02WG9KiLyv9i1+mTkarlE96Itdkw9vx0Bgu CDQd8o/qgmjsC2za4+6O5qG0LYdP+ApX9GuydlHz8xWfkRnFlIRyG7Y5OqKb5rvaf19a jebw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tL4TkKiSiRYRj1uz8KnqzhEfgLMItQcSWoP9inuZ0Ds=; b=mac5HLf/Z83zPaxiHPR4CyOZ5Cf+0zx1l4pfD2obfNO/Nd7wkaSo1UD/X6VRrnfQma yIH8zI6hSOKUkbma4kxG+BQvARwLWpcWp+kRgKyAqo8uOo4RnWghxqQ1gVvXxB/EAj6W loecTSJjo2fo/o3bPl7T1aK6BthBhER4iw0AefSo7K3raBd2j8jrJa0P89krnX7ag2Pu KOaGK9b/7tMm0WoqjlLUyCDTTo4xKQoyXSvYrUvo6SnhJaAtsklnHWCWE32LhuvQ8iPu Pk8+bEFWgvJEUKuUvIxiNk4C4lLdtPAp5WydSjf+NiogGRvg8zhm62snJ1jszKnN4pqX 9HYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7+qJjs5ik8qz5X0cZBhgUPNW9sKUsPM2QrmDk+lw9H1ayox0N8Ao1Pdc5LyPooOUWX84lRw/F2A32mfQ== X-Received: by 10.28.103.84 with SMTP id b81mr2212438wmc.124.1491636032625; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 00:20:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.148.54 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Apr 2017 00:20:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20170331164247.5052-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20170331164247.5052-13-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20170407174249.GC3022@jama> From: Martin Jansa Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 09:20:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Khem Raj X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.12 Cc: openembeded-devel Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 13/43] poco: Upgrade to 1.7.8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 07:20:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This is warning during buildtime. If this 2 packages are fighting which will provide the library, then users of this library will get different one to RDEPENDS from shlibs code each time the poco* are finished building in different order. I don't know if we have any poco users in our metadata, but making it deterministic is always good thing. On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa > wrote: > >> WARNING: poco-1.7.8-r0 do_package: poco-1.7.8 was registered as shlib > >> provider for libCppUnit.so.1, changing it to poco-cppunit-1.7.8 because > >> it was built later > > > > actually poco should not build a shared object at all since that > > should come from cppunit recipe. > > actually the library names are different. And move to make it part of > poco--cppunit is the right thing. What problems do you see ? package > upgrade ? >