From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C2A78752 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 01:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e194so10151014wmd.3 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:21:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DgA/5g1r1RT2JoxXeNLzETmcd/4Cht9HFMws53piULU=; b=rF4/nFwZ+yGHgDE+G7HY3uzyqe2G/n/ofgDbqLytMKwQ1ZKNtiK4eoA6lqTDnA7PhC ydj5P7ZIOkTj9HkWmSvDkLkdu+VI0+T0mMzFj6NQ6qk2qp3UwLh7gdnixx/as2lR2gd8 DtDX7dPFFUjFhMYa5wYR2e0VJr3HJPSLYtpirP/ZhRbS3PPms9JRt1e8kaid5ZeydeSY CBRqtLhKS/gm5cHu2OKx1LRb8MfqAbIE3gk3EJmIL7ZsEF72dJQ21eR+EwdPdZqewf5I 8PfXgFdJiqC7GI5AEvnFXv7iFY8fjxS1tw+0xFcrl6gB3TsbO1pTyRJY2M3F3Pj/s63e pg2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DgA/5g1r1RT2JoxXeNLzETmcd/4Cht9HFMws53piULU=; b=LCUeaNe0LEhEKi1UN9zPu4umS3ZKUhtlehBvt6xqz+kyGnPTHKmNtz5LmhPfnFP+qr Yos61NQbLA8w5+RdV0lcDpUtRveILpuJYRs3Yc9PDkVRk96XAk6zDi0lmLlTRzRs5qsJ DE0CU6yRuv8BArZQftPXHdPLxP54UhFuB37Ab3W7K/dkRgC2kOHswGD/sfX88G32p1F1 M580Eg5fl71+es6MUo7hHLpyuJuFMox+lsf7gtQh/9wi3/cxpdzHRKHqPPDAMFUgMtgv +KFeHNBKv6TuPrwpQhxgHwW0qTXInWiH9jYQhc3+FI+xCQgyDmYWG1eBHfdTw2GZCPWz hXFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GQwBl08ebTLkYx5Z2O8K/xKsthicZlPITtlL+neawSZx6vf1yi LqTbCno1MyfejuPSnakSzoxWrO/JvDaOo/iS+K5dNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELseKnb/OlXpt1mq2GMXGwfLjrPHTEeImILIccMNA2+JBe3dB/xUe1PO+Ra+pUG7XfuIPpzORc3uaTisFn/Z67Y= X-Received: by 10.28.212.141 with SMTP id l135mr1916093wmg.122.1520731299908; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:21:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.30.136 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:21:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1520639372-12916-1-git-send-email-juro.bystricky@intel.com> <20180310000058.15536.85416@do.openembedded.org> From: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 02:21:39 +0100 Message-ID: To: Andre McCurdy Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIGdjYzY6IFVwZ3JhZGUgdG8gNi40LjAgKGxhdGVzdCBzdGFibGUgc2VyaWVzIHJlbGVhc2UpIChyZXYzKQ==?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 01:21:39 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11469594ee10c0056718d841" --001a11469594ee10c0056718d841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Heh, I made the same mistake, I did remember that you sent some e-mail that there was v2 on the ML. So to be sure I've cherry-picked this one from your branch instead of cherry-picking from patchwork which already had your change included 2 more times in various pull requests from Khem: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/patches/?submitter=&state=&q=LPAE&archive=&delegate= so instead of checking which version was the correct one, I've cherry-picked it from your branch.. .. and only after the patchtest complained again, I've read the 2nd half of your message saying that your morty branch has v1 :). Fixed in my branches: To git+ssh://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib + 67f3094d7e...d4176ea2b1 jansa/morty -> jansa/morty (forced update) + 16250e9dba...155936a8e5 jansa/morty-backports -> jansa/morty-backports (forced update) + e619b8bef6...3367e9d602 jansa/pyro -> jansa/pyro (forced update) + e48f581764...8283b4ee52 jansa/pyro-backports -> jansa/pyro-backports (forced update) + a6bd32a657...5530f852e9 jansa/rocko -> jansa/rocko (forced update) + 0aae0b0579...56b25745e3 jansa/rocko-backports -> jansa/rocko-backports (forced update) On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Patchwork > wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: gcc6: Upgrade to 6.4.0 (latest stable series release) (rev3) > > Revision: 3 > > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/11226/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Issue Upstream-Status is in incorrect format > [test_upstream_status_presence_format] > > Suggested fix Fix Upstream-Status format in > 0001-enable-FL_LPAE-flag-for-armv7ve-cores.patch > > Current UpStream-Status: Backport > > Standard format Upstream-Status: > > Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate > [reason], Submitted [where] > > The v2 patch was sent to the list here: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/ > 2017-November/144159.html > > but it seems my morty branch still has the v1 patch with the typo... > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > --001a11469594ee10c0056718d841 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Heh, I made the same mistake, I did remember that you sent= some e-mail that there was v2 on the ML.

So to be sure = I've cherry-picked this one from your branch instead of cherry-picking = from patchwork which already had your change included 2 more times in vario= us pull requests from Khem:

so instead of checking which version= was the correct one, I've cherry-picked it from your branch..=C2=A0

.. and only after the patchtest complained again, I&= #39;ve read the 2nd half of your message saying that your morty branch has = v1 :).

Fixed in my branches:

=C2=A0+ 67f3094d7e...d4176ea2b1 jansa/morty -> jansa/morty (forced upd= ate)
=C2=A0+ 16250e9dba...155936a8e5 jansa/morty-backports -> = jansa/morty-backports (forced update)
=C2=A0+ e619b8bef6...3367e9= d602 jansa/pyro -> jansa/pyro (forced update)
=C2=A0+ e48f5817= 64...8283b4ee52 jansa/pyro-backports -> jansa/pyro-backports (forced upd= ate)
=C2=A0+ a6bd32a657...5530f852e9 jansa/rocko -> jansa/rock= o (forced update)
=C2=A0+ 0aae0b0579...56b25745e3 jansa/rocko-bac= kports -> jansa/rocko-backports (forced update)


On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
On = Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Patchwork
<patchwork@patch= work.openembedded.org> wrote:
> =3D=3D Series Details =3D=3D
>
> Series: gcc6: Upgrade to 6.4.0 (latest stable series release) (rev3) > Revision: 3
> URL=C2=A0 =C2=A0: https://patchwork.openem= bedded.org/series/11226/
> State : failure
>
> =3D=3D Summary =3D=3D
>
> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This = is
> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the propose= d
> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
>
> * Issue=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Upstream-Status= is in incorrect format [test_upstream_status_presence_format]
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Suggested fix=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fix Upstream-Status format in 0= 001-enable-FL_LPAE-flag-for-armv7ve-cores.patch
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Current=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 UpStream-Status:= Backport
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Standard format=C2=A0 Upstream-Status: <Valid status>= ;
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Valid status=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Pending, Accepted, Backpor= t, Denied, Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where]

The v2 patch was sent to the list here:

=C2=A0 http://lis= ts.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-November/144= 159.html

but it seems my morty branch still has the v1 patch with the typo...
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-co= re@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/m= ailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

--001a11469594ee10c0056718d841--