From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80BAC83007 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9162073E for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="tVreQPq4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726611AbgD2HEz (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 03:04:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48252 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726274AbgD2HEz (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 03:04:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED759C03C1AD; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id z6so756287wml.2; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=lZ6vcTjHNoVR0BCaYLoW2vQQfiZtE3GkLmVwbDb3kKs=; b=tVreQPq4FATIBvu29HrXIQXOrj6WwT6KHRsB7KD9AzBZVIN3KBo0PEoYV+HeelarpS Sb/qfsKwowYEdswNRMNVmX8eC2vJkhpO5g2W0dZ1ICyiavdllNmR9MzXvW0O3tXGJD4r g94GHReNjAzQlbz0VzgLe9d6OS005K/Xwi7NCYR/q+oMHnOlMc/N7M25nde/Mn/Ky41D cXwo6OZPEmnu6eRnWHYMvCdnqL1CIYIAKHv4PKXsIOGwwtzd2fbRuv+RGIntfEE6ZgST fQ0o1Y04zSe5ASD/PCzCse424ALd5u2SJITmillubtxw8m5JSmdlI3g+fzvEWOkNwrzR lFhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lZ6vcTjHNoVR0BCaYLoW2vQQfiZtE3GkLmVwbDb3kKs=; b=oDobdlitjKJ3OU2rcUFRwQLraXbOGRsChXG/Dv1eubHmTVJboIWIWwq7vy6LrUSyOe 2rCXoPmHHbKXvX4tz+zfZApnTmOk2+lY83Ud9UVPMHfRYffB0f6esENCxZyiYDdWjIWf 6X+Y1SRJtMoR7kALsysR9a97LaepUj4e+6VUkz7IGob/oKh135f+D+9XQGwnri9sOM4N VSXSXq69KDJQV5WhnJk2f2Z06lZegxi8fUsg+YvpcFNvDOfaaMux8xmMazADXPL/dUGe 9qNvW642FXFVXk8rWObM5BavPjN3V1AElldXJWdKl999pmQ18UXMKzl/vuyQObuvem6W /+ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaaHVE7gFRcFOk6O3dBfaRTDnYKhlIUqIltXI+SlrDRnBmxlqj3 rHBbSbbcXIgMK5RlyX/eWZAbLcOEF8fvtW8nmeIlT9bH X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI3Iq8207zhRpNrY8dIDiLkFXeP/Fd4LMrDY3WkIFCs42hS9q/Na1H3690kVE+VCKXnGkPO2BRaF2kfMfu1LVk= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7416:: with SMTP id p22mr1615489wmc.80.1588143893648; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200423171807.29713-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20200428221419.2530697-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200428221419.2530697-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com From: Sedat Dilek Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Allow ld.lld to link the MIPS VDSO To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Masahiro Yamada , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Clang-Built-Linux ML , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Fangrui Song , Sami Tolvanen , Dmitry Golovin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain > ld.bfd checks. > Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in this series? Most people agreed on this name AFAICS. What do people think? - Sedat -