On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:46 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> > What are your plans to have...
>>> >
>>> > 4d2b25f630c7 locking/atomics: Instrument cmpxchg_double*()
>>> > f9881cc43b11 locking/atomics: Instrument xchg()
>>> > df79ed2c0643 locking/atomics: Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation
>>> > 00d5551cc4ee locking/atomics/x86: Reduce arch_cmpxchg64*() instrumentation
>>> >
>>> > ...for example in Linux 4.18 or 4.17.y?
>>>
>>> I have no plans to have these backported.
>>
>> If they help us compile with clang, we'll backport to 4.17, 4.14, 4.9,
>> and 4.4 stable.  From
>> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/3#issuecomment-408839428,
>> it sounds like that is the case.
>>
>
> I am doing a CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=n build right now and see
> tommorow if it boots on bare metal.
>

Looks good (beyond some ACPI errors).
My kernel-config and dmesg-log are attached.

- sed@ -