Re: [PATCH 0/4] [v4] Kbuild: std=gnu11 changes

[Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:01 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 06:18:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:09 AM Linus Torvalds
> > > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > >
> > > > > I've incorporated the feedback from Masahiro Yamada in this
> > > > > version, splitting out one more patch, rebasing on top of
> > > > > the kbuild tree, and changing the order of the patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please apply to the kbuild tree.
> > > >
> > > > I'd actually like to see this as a separate branch, so that I can
> > > > merge it early - or other peoples git branches end up depending on it.
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, I can apply this to a separate branch, kbuild-gnu11.
> > > (and I will queue this up shortly because it is already -rc7)
> > >
> > > Then, I will send two pull reqs in the next MW,
> > > but please note they will conflict with each other,
> > > between this gnu11 patch set and the following
> > > one in my usual kbuild branch:
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/patch/20220201213542.2808035-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > I hope this is not a complex conflict, but please let me know
> > > if you have any requests to me.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > All, applied to linux-kbuild/kbuild-gnu11.
> >
> > If somebody wants to give Reviewed-by, Acked-by, Tested-by, please.
> >
> > I will append them later.
>
> For the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>

For the series:

Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> # LLVM/Clang v13.0.0 (x86-64)

- Sedat -