All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kan Yan <kyan@google.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hayes <kevinhayes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] mac80211: Implement Airtime-based Queue Limit (AQL)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:27:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+iem5vrM0iF+yvS9m==UWnhp=DFV924ir-0nHcn6cwarEjZNA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rudqpsg.fsf@toke.dk>

Thanks for the review. I will pick up your new patches and give it a
try tomorrow.

> Why is this setting sta and device limits to the same value?

local->aql_txq_limit_low is not the per device limit, but the default
txq_limit for all STAs. Individual stations can be configured with
non-default value via debugfs entry
"netdev:interface_name_x/stations/mac_addr_x/airtime". "aql_threshold"
is the device limit for switching between the lower and higher per
station queue limit.

> Also, are you sure we won't risk write tearing when writing 32-bit
> values without locking on some architectures?

Does mac80211 ever runs in any 16-bit architectures? Even in an
architecture that write to 32-bit value is not atomic, I don't think
there is any side-effect for queue limit get wrong transiently in rare
occasions. Besides, the practical value of those queue limits should
always fit into 16 bits.

> I don't think this is right; another thread could do atomic_inc()
> between the atomic_read() and atomic_set() here, in which case this
> would clobber the other value.
> I think to get this right the logic would need to be something like
> this:
> retry:
>   old = atomic_read(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending);
>   if (warn_once(tx_airtime > old))
>      new = 0;
>   else
>      new = old - tx_airtime;
>   if (atomic_cmpxchg(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending, old, new) != old)
>      goto retry;
> (or use an equivalent do/while).

That's indeed not right. However, if a potential aql_tx_pending
underflow case is detected here (It should never happen), reset it to
0 maybe not the best remedy anyway. I think it is better  just
WARN_ONCE() and skip updating aql_tx_pending all together, so the
retry or loop can be avoided here. What do you think?


On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:48 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Kan Yan <kyan@google.com> writes:
>
> > In order for the Fq_CoDel algorithm integrated in mac80211 layer to operate
> > effectively to control excessive queueing latency, the CoDel algorithm
> > requires an accurate measure of how long packets stays in the queue, AKA
> > sojourn time. The sojourn time measured at the mac80211 layer doesn't
> > include queueing latency in the lower layer (firmware/hardware) and CoDel
> > expects lower layer to have a short queue. However, most 802.11ac chipsets
> > offload tasks such TX aggregation to firmware or hardware, thus have a deep
> > lower layer queue.
> >
> > Without a mechanism to control the lower layer queue size, packets only
> > stay in mac80211 layer transiently before being sent to firmware queue.
> > As a result, the sojourn time measured by CoDel in the mac80211 layer is
> > almost always lower than the CoDel latency target, hence CoDel does little
> > to control the latency, even when the lower layer queue causes excessive
> > latency.
> >
> > The Byte Queue Limits (BQL) mechanism is commonly used to address the
> > similar issue with wired network interface. However, this method cannot be
> > applied directly to the wireless network interface. "Bytes" is not a
> > suitable measure of queue depth in the wireless network, as the data rate
> > can vary dramatically from station to station in the same network, from a
> > few Mbps to over Gbps.
> >
> > This patch implements an Airtime-based Queue Limit (AQL) to make CoDel work
> > effectively with wireless drivers that utilized firmware/hardware
> > offloading. AQL allows each txq to release just enough packets to the lower
> > layer to form 1-2 large aggregations to keep hardware fully utilized and
> > retains the rest of the frames in mac80211 layer to be controlled by the
> > CoDel algorithm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Yan <kyan@google.com>
> > [ Toke: Keep API to set pending airtime internal, fix nits in commit msg ]
> > Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks for the update! A few comments below. I'll also send you and
> updated version of my patch following this one, with fixes for Johannes'
> comments. You can include that in your next version...
>
> > ---
> >  include/net/cfg80211.h     |  7 ++++
> >  include/net/mac80211.h     | 12 ++++++
> >  net/mac80211/debugfs.c     | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-----
> >  net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h |  4 ++
> >  net/mac80211/main.c        | 10 ++++-
> >  net/mac80211/sta_info.c    | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  net/mac80211/sta_info.h    |  8 ++++
> >  net/mac80211/tx.c          | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  9 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> > index 4ab2c49423dc..15f9f04de149 100644
> > --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
> > +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> > @@ -2602,6 +2602,13 @@ enum wiphy_params_flags {
> >
> >  #define IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AIRTIME_WEIGHT     256
> >
> > +/* The per TXQ device queue limit in airtime */
> > +#define IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AQL_TXQ_LIMIT_L    4000
> > +#define IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AQL_TXQ_LIMIT_H    8000
> > +
> > +/* The per interface airtime threshold to switch to lower queue limit */
> > +#define IEEE80211_AQL_THRESHOLD                      24000
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * struct cfg80211_pmksa - PMK Security Association
> >   *
> > diff --git a/include/net/mac80211.h b/include/net/mac80211.h
> > index 4319596ef472..269be699e89c 100644
> > --- a/include/net/mac80211.h
> > +++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
> > @@ -5558,6 +5558,18 @@ void ieee80211_send_eosp_nullfunc(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, int tid);
> >  void ieee80211_sta_register_airtime(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, u8 tid,
> >                                   u32 tx_airtime, u32 rx_airtime);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * ieee80211_txq_airtime_check - check if a txq can send frame to device
> > + *
> > + * @hw: pointer obtained from ieee80211_alloc_hw()
> > + * @txq: pointer obtained from station or virtual interface
> > + *
> > + * Return true if the AQL's airtime limit has not been reached and the txq can
> > + * continue to send more packets to the device. Otherwise return false.
> > + */
> > +bool
> > +ieee80211_txq_airtime_check(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_txq *txq);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * ieee80211_iter_keys - iterate keys programmed into the device
> >   * @hw: pointer obtained from ieee80211_alloc_hw()
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
> > index 568b3b276931..d77ea0e51c1d 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
> > @@ -148,6 +148,80 @@ static const struct file_operations aqm_ops = {
> >       .llseek = default_llseek,
> >  };
> >
> > +static ssize_t aql_txq_limit_read(struct file *file,
> > +                               char __user *user_buf,
> > +                               size_t count,
> > +                               loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > +     struct ieee80211_local *local = file->private_data;
> > +     char buf[400];
> > +     int len = 0;
> > +
> > +     len = scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > +                     "AC     AQL limit low   AQL limit high\n"
> > +                     "VO     %u              %u\n"
> > +                     "VI     %u              %u\n"
> > +                     "BE     %u              %u\n"
> > +                     "BK     %u              %u\n",
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_low[IEEE80211_AC_VO],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_high[IEEE80211_AC_VO],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_low[IEEE80211_AC_VI],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_high[IEEE80211_AC_VI],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_low[IEEE80211_AC_BE],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_high[IEEE80211_AC_BE],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_low[IEEE80211_AC_BK],
> > +                     local->aql_txq_limit_high[IEEE80211_AC_BK]);
> > +     return simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos,
> > +                                    buf, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t aql_txq_limit_write(struct file *file,
> > +                                const char __user *user_buf,
> > +                                size_t count,
> > +                                loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > +     struct ieee80211_local *local = file->private_data;
> > +     char buf[100];
> > +     size_t len;
> > +     u32 ac, q_limit_low, q_limit_high;
> > +     struct sta_info *sta;
> > +
> > +     if (count > sizeof(buf))
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buf, count))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = 0;
> > +     len = strlen(buf);
> > +     if (len > 0 && buf[len - 1] == '\n')
> > +             buf[len - 1] = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (sscanf(buf, "%u %u %u", &ac, &q_limit_low, &q_limit_high) != 3)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (ac >= IEEE80211_NUM_ACS)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     local->aql_txq_limit_low[ac] = q_limit_low;
> > +     local->aql_txq_limit_high[ac] = q_limit_high;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&local->sta_mtx);
> > +     list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> > +             sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_low = q_limit_low;
> > +             sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_high = q_limit_high;
> > +     }
>
> Why is this setting sta and device limits to the same value?
>
> Also, are you sure we won't risk write tearing when writing 32-bit
> values without locking on some architectures?
>
> > +     mutex_unlock(&local->sta_mtx);
> > +     return count;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct file_operations aql_txq_limit_ops = {
> > +     .write = aql_txq_limit_write,
> > +     .read = aql_txq_limit_read,
> > +     .open = simple_open,
> > +     .llseek = default_llseek,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static ssize_t force_tx_status_read(struct file *file,
> >                                   char __user *user_buf,
> >                                   size_t count,
> > @@ -441,6 +515,10 @@ void debugfs_hw_add(struct ieee80211_local *local)
> >       debugfs_create_u16("airtime_flags", 0600,
> >                          phyd, &local->airtime_flags);
> >
> > +     DEBUGFS_ADD(aql_txq_limit);
> > +     debugfs_create_u32("aql_threshold", 0600,
> > +                        phyd, &local->aql_threshold);
> > +
> >       statsd = debugfs_create_dir("statistics", phyd);
> >
> >       /* if the dir failed, don't put all the other things into the root! */
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> > index c8ad20c28c43..0185e6e5e5d1 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> > @@ -197,10 +197,12 @@ static ssize_t sta_airtime_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
> >  {
> >       struct sta_info *sta = file->private_data;
> >       struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->sdata->local;
> > -     size_t bufsz = 200;
> > +     size_t bufsz = 400;
> >       char *buf = kzalloc(bufsz, GFP_KERNEL), *p = buf;
> >       u64 rx_airtime = 0, tx_airtime = 0;
> >       s64 deficit[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> > +     u32 q_depth[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> > +     u32 q_limit_l[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS], q_limit_h[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> >       ssize_t rv;
> >       int ac;
> >
> > @@ -212,19 +214,22 @@ static ssize_t sta_airtime_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
> >               rx_airtime += sta->airtime[ac].rx_airtime;
> >               tx_airtime += sta->airtime[ac].tx_airtime;
> >               deficit[ac] = sta->airtime[ac].deficit;
> > +             q_limit_l[ac] = sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_low;
> > +             q_limit_h[ac] = sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_high;
> >               spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
> > +             q_depth[ac] = atomic_read(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending);
> >       }
> >
> >       p += scnprintf(p, bufsz + buf - p,
> >               "RX: %llu us\nTX: %llu us\nWeight: %u\n"
> > -             "Deficit: VO: %lld us VI: %lld us BE: %lld us BK: %lld us\n",
> > -             rx_airtime,
> > -             tx_airtime,
> > -             sta->airtime_weight,
> > -             deficit[0],
> > -             deficit[1],
> > -             deficit[2],
> > -             deficit[3]);
> > +             "Deficit: VO: %lld us VI: %lld us BE: %lld us BK: %lld us\n"
> > +             "Q depth: VO: %u us VI: %u us BE: %u us BK: %u us\n"
> > +             "Q limit[low/high]: VO: %u/%u VI: %u/%u BE: %u/%u BK: %u/%u\n",
> > +             rx_airtime, tx_airtime, sta->airtime_weight,
> > +             deficit[0], deficit[1], deficit[2], deficit[3],
> > +             q_depth[0], q_depth[1], q_depth[2], q_depth[3],
> > +             q_limit_l[0], q_limit_h[0], q_limit_l[1], q_limit_h[1],
> > +             q_limit_l[2], q_limit_h[2], q_limit_l[3], q_limit_h[3]),
> >
> >       rv = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, p - buf);
> >       kfree(buf);
> > @@ -236,7 +241,25 @@ static ssize_t sta_airtime_write(struct file *file, const char __user *userbuf,
> >  {
> >       struct sta_info *sta = file->private_data;
> >       struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->sdata->local;
> > -     int ac;
> > +     u32 ac, q_limit_l, q_limit_h;
> > +     char _buf[100] = {}, *buf = _buf;
> > +
> > +     if (count > sizeof(_buf))
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     buf[sizeof(_buf) - 1] = '\0';
> > +     if (sscanf(buf, "queue limit %u %u %u", &ac, &q_limit_l, &q_limit_h)
> > +         != 3)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (ac >= IEEE80211_NUM_ACS)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_low = q_limit_l;
> > +     sta->airtime[ac].aql_limit_high = q_limit_h;
>
> Same concern as above re: unprotected writes.
>
> >       for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) {
> >               spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> > index 225ea4e3cd76..ad15b3be8bb3 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> > @@ -1142,6 +1142,10 @@ struct ieee80211_local {
> >       u16 schedule_round[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> >
> >       u16 airtime_flags;
> > +     u32 aql_txq_limit_low[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> > +     u32 aql_txq_limit_high[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
> > +     u32 aql_threshold;
> > +     atomic_t aql_total_pending_airtime;
> >
> >       const struct ieee80211_ops *ops;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > index aba094b4ccfc..071ea92a3748 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
> > @@ -667,8 +667,16 @@ struct ieee80211_hw *ieee80211_alloc_hw_nm(size_t priv_data_len,
> >       for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) {
> >               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->active_txqs[i]);
> >               spin_lock_init(&local->active_txq_lock[i]);
> > +             local->aql_txq_limit_low[i] = IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AQL_TXQ_LIMIT_L;
> > +             local->aql_txq_limit_high[i] =
> > +                     IEEE80211_DEFAULT_AQL_TXQ_LIMIT_H;
> >       }
> > -     local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX | AIRTIME_USE_RX;
> > +
> > +     local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX |
> > +                            AIRTIME_USE_RX |
> > +                            AIRTIME_USE_AQL;
> > +     local->aql_threshold = IEEE80211_AQL_THRESHOLD;
> > +     atomic_set(&local->aql_total_pending_airtime, 0);
> >
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->chanctx_list);
> >       mutex_init(&local->chanctx_mtx);
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> > index bd11fef2139f..a76e935a543a 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> > @@ -396,6 +396,9 @@ struct sta_info *sta_info_alloc(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> >               skb_queue_head_init(&sta->ps_tx_buf[i]);
> >               skb_queue_head_init(&sta->tx_filtered[i]);
> >               sta->airtime[i].deficit = sta->airtime_weight;
> > +             atomic_set(&sta->airtime[i].aql_tx_pending, 0);
> > +             sta->airtime[i].aql_limit_low = local->aql_txq_limit_low[i];
> > +             sta->airtime[i].aql_limit_high = local->aql_txq_limit_high[i];
> >       }
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS; i++)
> > @@ -1893,6 +1896,43 @@ void ieee80211_sta_register_airtime(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, u8 tid,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_sta_register_airtime);
> >
> > +void ieee80211_sta_update_pending_airtime(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> > +                                       struct sta_info *sta, u8 ac,
> > +                                       u16 tx_airtime, bool tx_completed)
> > +{
> > +     if (!tx_completed) {
> > +             if (sta)
> > +                     atomic_add(tx_airtime,
> > +                                &sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending);
> > +
> > +             atomic_add(tx_airtime, &local->aql_total_pending_airtime);
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (sta) {
> > +             if (WARN_ONCE(atomic_read(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending) <
> > +                           tx_airtime,
> > +                           "STA %pM AC %d txq pending airtime underflow: %u, %u",
> > +                           sta->addr, ac,
> > +                           atomic_read(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending),
> > +                           tx_airtime))
> > +                     atomic_set(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending, 0);
>
> I don't think this is right; another thread could do atomic_inc()
> between the atomic_read() and atomic_set() here, in which case this
> would clobber the other value.
>
> I think to get this right the logic would need to be something like
> this:
>
> retry:
>   old = atomic_read(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending);
>   if (warn_once(tx_airtime > old))
>      new = 0;
>   else
>      new = old - tx_airtime;
>
>   if (atomic_cmpxchg(&sta->airtime[ac].aql_tx_pending, old, new) != old)
>      goto retry;
>
>
> (or use an equivalent do/while).
>
>
> -Toke
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-13  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12  2:11 [PATCH v7 0/2] Implement Airtime-based Queue Limit (AQL) Kan Yan
2019-11-12  2:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] mac80211: " Kan Yan
2019-11-12 11:47   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-13  2:27     ` Kan Yan [this message]
2019-11-13 14:02       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-14  2:26         ` Kan Yan
2019-11-12  2:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mac80211: Use Airtime-based Queue Limits (AQL) on packet dequeue Kan Yan
2019-11-12 22:42   ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-12 22:42     ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+iem5vrM0iF+yvS9m==UWnhp=DFV924ir-0nHcn6cwarEjZNA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kyan@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kevinhayes@google.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yiboz@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.