From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C0829E00824; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:31:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (daiane.list[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8496CE00814 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hy10so9024569vcb.4 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YVyBRBuyo+HJLva8PyNbtjMWIx8ZkZvO5sfv/q1JELc=; b=R4rJOIakAhgaGyiZ5w2JIPrGGSBZSYUeGtXVpzJYuapU6Kv+M4m73igxjsXBysK53A niyCYTtVQnjpL5hXrc/SbzgZ8DUmoajjEZaZiuQ04mjj/v8Le2T9w22935kHp1bYgSot 0ZVYeZ5IRxjlO6tKHNDR2dXqLCiC9SL7GrvnzupW1xBNlJzFsJJfSt27tV2ErN1hReQJ jfS5zZMbWPCGDFoNKgU+SqhVflO+tl4zcY+ga5rJIM+bOTtmovTcbmC7ca2vvehRv/BG 0XQCJ3qYGuMy7aEJh6kYmyuRzfq/c+zmRaNo1A619emeXMYQ5kwgpwaeCYIgQF+P5Tw4 Rqxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.227.72 with SMTP id ry8mr5350750vdc.64.1408541472694; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: angolini@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: angolini@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.118.132 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53F3B1A4.9080105@gmail.com> References: <8f1e8166115a4a4381ded78a5536c001@BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <23db6296a5b24ce3accdde41476d7d6d@DM2PR0301MB0701.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <53F3738E.4040902@boundarydevices.com> <53F39AF2.9090008@boundarydevices.com> <3310df336e324285a7539c861de00e93@DM2PR0301MB0701.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <53F3B1A4.9080105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:31:12 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Uzp2mqKXWf3SseSAVKWPRj-m_Ws Message-ID: From: Daiane Angolini To: Otavio Salvador Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: i.MX 3.10.31-1.1.0_beta release - community feedback requested X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:31:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think a lot has been said, and I agree with arguments from both sides. I=C2=B4ve been talking to Otavio and Lauren directly as well, and I decided to be the last one to say something. As community, we must think about ourselves, what are the guidelines that (hum) guides us. And I=C2=B4ve been trying to factor the most important goals we would have. I don=C2=B4t know if it=C2=B4s right or comp= lete, but I made my list: * stable branch is stable * we are part of Yocto Project We are part of Yocto Project. Freescale release/layer is not part of Yocto Project. meta-fsl-bsp-release does not need to follow the Yocto Project release schedule. We do. I remember this is not the first time we discuss how stable should we keep our next stable branch with the price of having the latest. And, I don=C2=B4t think this is the last. One can say we must decide each release, case by case. However, I don=C2=B4t want to spend my time again talking about this again next release. Again. For me, it=C2=B4s clear that Freescale not being part of Yocto Project is what causes this mismatch of release dates, and until they realize we follow YP release timing, we will keep spending time in the same discussion. I really prefer chocolate cake, seriously. Otavio, I think everyone gave the 2 cents needed. We have already money for a coxinha here. With my 2 cents we can buy the refri and make a party. Can you, please, start a new clean thread for us to formalize the votes and count it precisely? (only votes, please, more arguments can be shared in this thread) I formalize my vote there. Please, let me know what you think. Daiane