From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BF7CAE0078A; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (daiane.list[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (mail-vc0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFC7E006B5 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ik5so5562469vcb.35 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2ESk/WIVdu7gI8PPXWHu80xgLi4+11N14pTiU4pFUZI=; b=V6Huro6ZiUk1GZBA1FI1SYe1TsvmgcIwbsDnkM0sIf4L4HVI2YiFKsE6yNDKZGcuES /daV4tZrNyPT2HJp0Xt7xuxa9mdp/qKwhZWD+BrYgLwmAR+iHkf0+Cfu9yw7SHUaGXB8 Xb6wk5K0adi2+DBTX//lYtdmsacun6xQBGkQkhKblDnf9EPj7+kS4GLYxtTfqVUTjUgI SRj2JdrMSaEUti8LnpM9j53bKzyLWeGlJtxsTTmYVYXA5hDC/34JCEF54AQ1KcXs1+uF lLTrgvZqXpT8zTl8GafXQyT5pL7pkr8Iax43TNgQ8JMpnNoOya27jc1aR3yILv1XtI9Y 84kg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.0.132 with SMTP id 4mr17557362vde.10.1409580749915; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: angolini@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: angolini@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.148.145 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:12:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54037CF3.8090204@gmail.com> References: <1409166432-9582-1-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <1409166432-9582-12-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <2aa4ccc8204247ccaae163e648b206b4@CY1PR0301MB0700.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <54037CF3.8090204@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:12:29 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Yn7p6jI1QY_j0LQloBr5U4t7GGA Message-ID: From: Daiane Angolini To: John Weber Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 11/14] imx-vpu: Upgrade to 3.10.31-1.1.0 Beta X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:12:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, John Weber wrote: > Another reason to consider going a different path is that naming them after > a kernel release (as implied by the 3.10.31_1.1.0 name), implies (to me) And, please, note that "3.10.31_1.1.0" is not "1.0.0" because it's the second release of kernel 3.10.y. 3.10.17_1.0.0 = v1 3.10.31_1.1.0 = v2 At first time I saw that, 1.1.0 looked like a typo for me. Daiane