From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4B779E00A54; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:49:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (daiane.list[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700D6E009D6 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lagc2 with SMTP id c2so260821011lag.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:49:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MgqXnY6HlT3pb8OY7h0PUC7mS1KUL0GzNXs/zPdfcso=; b=rly3ypaxiwSJqW7+4AO6BJDWh3Am3TAgmaweSxUzj+5JSZBmY2lgD2/Nb2I0DZ795F F1xZ9cfyn8TsWv8IDIOxMWANQO6YmRxlygCvKN770dydSfCp+7LSU3j6tontKylnsaFZ Z4Zysi6x5WdgSOUxRxRRT9nxxfNW7Yn4ty6qnnsqhBQfQlzB5hlfh9RtKY09gORJOLa3 7BjTTz1A6MpPZqT3xsaNWV6zd4u42gn8sb/bgb4RphfREFn3ZCTT1q8IkQpfaorXWkIk NbCmzI4lT3iqVENjeCrA6GhrnccJJYGRX1b6FBw8P9pXF7mXZx99Wc4ODlvq+JM3/QXP 595Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.10.72 with SMTP id g8mr19244571lab.97.1436528963584; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: angolini@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: angolini@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.81.106 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:49:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150709171854.4375f53b@eukrea.com> References: <20150709171854.4375f53b@eukrea.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:49:23 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9YPOblLyixOCfv_xkX_1R9P5WuU Message-ID: From: Daiane Angolini To: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: SOC_FAMILY Rework X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:49:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > Hi Daiane, > > Le Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:54:14 -0300, > Daiane Angolini a =C3=A9crit : >> I'm sorry, Otavio, but you are not re-thinking what we have. I don't >> think this list is fine. I don't see why to separate imx5 from imxs. >> And, after GCC 5.X is up and linux-imx_2.6.35 is gone, imx5 will be >> exactly like a imx3. >> > Does that mean there is an updated GPU library and full IPU drivers for > more recent kernels than 2.6.35 for i.MX53 ? Not that I know, Eric. The topic about i.MX53 become mailine was discussed in last community meeting, and we was not able to figure out a better option. At least I personally cannot take this task. If needed we can setup another meeting or open a new thread on this topic. Daiane > > Thanks, > Eric