From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B8A38E006E6; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:29:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (daiane.list[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074AE003A8 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so16216478laa.1 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YtXSiVOhtm3WcJb8IMurwz6fD/F8Kl2owjMZ+BzZOkA=; b=dn8jLN+68T49AUl8PMqQxmTL8m6mt6oxtpo7+R01RHhkTF5LcTHfNiRfJKDkkqnVz6 6mCc3aDaxeOPLEb+npVLu/BnN7iaGATPc8TqsuArKGt9uWD7c2W5laSfka7pI7uI1Dww MkQwkr5jQb/m0zD/9BgyT2IAqFwgT/yJUszOakwbBbyqhwJmmqQs0NDUqiSPiwf/JN23 b3kUvSg5dbLXj4DxI75SqqS3MdIo8kXq8JSmbm8lLK1fsnvEapSEXbOR0l7mkKx9FKNZ Y2/ayNqbPfuYNe13Uz1dglmRPBZPxe+Ixg986lOdPfYWUGbTEwL4LF2qMUwv1x0VyE5I JU2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.146.41 with SMTP id sz9mr9674432lbb.77.1428337766227; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: angolini@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: angolini@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.2.179 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1428007119-13395-1-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <1428007119-13395-2-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:29:26 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wXPq3zuTXFUbK3sBkiiohCtU1y8 Message-ID: From: Daiane Angolini To: Otavio Salvador Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 01/11] linux-imx: Upgrade to 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA version X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:29:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Lauren Post wrote: >> 3.10.53 only exists in master branch now so to remove it means it will not exist on any branch. > > It exists in Git so if someone ever wants or need it, can easily > revert the patch and use. > >> In past we only removed kernel versions that exist in other branches. > > It was just by coincidence because of the release cadence matched the branching. > >> I believe it is best to leave 3.10.53 and remove in master branch after fido branch is created. > > I see no reason to keep it around and untested from now on. Community > resources for test are restrict so it will end untested plus the more > people relying on 3.14 the better as it is closer to mainline. > > Someone one has any technical reason to keep it around? Is 3.14 beta or GA? I think this is a good technical reason to keep 3.10.53 if this is the only GA kernel available at time. Another important point is GPU compatibility. Is 3.14 GPU compatible with 3.10.53 GPU? Daiane