From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: some failures with vxlan offloads..
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:59:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx9TCtHgW=TegUgjZ6Se=mP+0CNiNHYmbYHPd1cJJGYoBQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54508020.1040305@mellanox.com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 5:36 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if we have another bug somewhere... when both sides were
>>> offloaded,
>>> >it works even with the mlx4 bug, canyou explain that?is it possible that
>>> > the
>>> >GRO stack somehow covers on the bug when both sides are offloaded and
>>> >GRO/VXLAN comes into play?
>>>
>> Look at the receive side. As I mentioned, if the device is returning
>> checksum-unnecessary and setting csum_level to 1 (inner checksum was
>> validated) then stack won't try to verify the outer checksum. So in
>> this case if outer checksum is incorrect nobody complains about it.
>
>
> OK, I'll look there. Anything that should worries us at that stack trace I
> sent in my initial email of this thread, or you think this is related to the
> mlx4 driver checksum bug?
>
The trace doesn't seem like it would be related to a checksum bug. Do
you only see this with offload enabled?
> Or.
>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-26 13:36 some failures with vxlan offloads Or Gerlitz
2014-10-26 15:29 ` Tom Herbert
2014-10-26 22:23 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-10-27 1:23 ` Tom Herbert
2014-10-28 15:27 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-10-28 15:36 ` Tom Herbert
2014-10-29 5:50 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-10-29 14:59 ` Tom Herbert [this message]
2014-10-29 15:56 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+mtBx9TCtHgW=TegUgjZ6Se=mP+0CNiNHYmbYHPd1cJJGYoBQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=therbert@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.