From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping
	memory after save operation
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:52:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CA0192B3.2DA37%keir@xen.org>
References: <4DDBBFF1.4050905@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DDBBFF1.4050905@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@novell.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 24/05/2011 15:25, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@novell.com> wrote:

> BTW, thanks for the commit message note about "backporting to relevant
> earlier trees".  I was going to ask that this be applied to
> 4.1-testing.  Should such a statement be included for fixes that apply
> to multiple trees?  Is it helpful for scanning potential backports in
> -unstable?

Worth pointing out that at the moment only I seem to be backporting to the
stable trees, and I only do that for tools patches that I am explicitly
requested to do by a toolstack maintainer. A comment in a changeset comment
is fine if it is a reminder for Ian, but it is useless in terms of getting
me to apply it to 4.1-testing (for example).

 -- Keir