From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516576B0269 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 04:13:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id f13-v6so3236452wrr.4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id g12-v6sor104369wmd.18.2018.10.24.01.13.04 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:13:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181020211200.255171-1-marcorr@google.com> <20181020211200.255171-2-marcorr@google.com> <20181022200617.GD14374@char.us.oracle.com> <20181023123355.GI32333@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181024061650.GZ18839@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20181024061650.GZ18839@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Marc Orr Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:12:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kvm PATCH 1/2] mm: export __vmalloc_node_range() Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , David Rientjes No. I separated them because they're going to two different subsystems (i.e., mm and kvm). I'll fold them and resend the patch. Thanks, Marc On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:16 AM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 23-10-18 17:10:55, Marc Orr wrote: > > Ack. The user is the 2nd patch in this series, the kvm_intel module, > > which uses this version of vmalloc() to allocate vcpus across > > non-contiguous memory. I will cc everyone here on that 2nd patch for > > context. > > Is there any reason to not fold those two into a single one? > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs